IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v13y2020i5p1103-d327255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simulation Calculation Method of a Water Hammer with Multpoint Collapsing

Author

Listed:
  • Li Zhao

    (School of Energy and Architecture, Xi’an Aeronautical University, Xi’an 710077, China)

  • Yusi Yang

    (School of Architecture and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Water Supply and Drainage, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Tong Wang

    (School of Architecture and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Water Supply and Drainage, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Liang Zhou

    (School of Energy and Architecture, Xi’an Aeronautical University, Xi’an 710077, China)

  • Yong Li

    (School of Architecture and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Water Supply and Drainage, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Miao Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Water Supply and Drainage, Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

The traditional discrete vapor cavity model (DVCM) is widely used in water hammer simulation. Water column separation in pipelines is usually predicted with this model. Nevertheless, the main weaknesses of this model consist of numerical instability and nonconvergence. Regarding the weaknesses of the traditional model, this paper discusses an improved method. The new method uses a new water hammer velocity formula, a new cavity model, and a floating grid method. Through simulations to test the effects of the new model, an experimental platform can be established to realize a water hammer with multipoint collapsing. The numerical simulation was programmed in C++ and the test was carried out with an actual pipeline model built in the laboratory. After certain modelling and calibration, the parameters in the simulation calculation were consistent with the measured parameters in the test. The numerical simulation results were compared with the experimental results. For the hydraulic transient system with multipoint collapsing, the superposition effect of the wave crest of the pseudo-water hammer in the traditional calculation model was obvious. The pressure of the water hammer in the simulation calculation was significantly higher than the actual value and the convergence effect of the water hammer wave was not good. Compared with the results of the traditional model, the simulation results of the new model were closer to the measured values. Therefore, the new model has better numerical solution accuracy, stability, and convergence, which is worth further study and promotion.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Zhao & Yusi Yang & Tong Wang & Liang Zhou & Yong Li & Miao Zhang, 2020. "A Simulation Calculation Method of a Water Hammer with Multpoint Collapsing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:1103-:d:327255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1103/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1103/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sorin-Ioan Lupa & Martin Gagnon & Sebastian Muntean & Georges Abdul-Nour, 2022. "The Impact of Water Hammer on Hydraulic Power Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Lei Hou & Peibin Gong & Hai Sun & Lei Zhang & Jianhua Ren & Yiyan Cheng, 2024. "Emergency Pump-Rate Regulation to Mitigate Water-Hammer Effect—An Integrated Data-Driven Strategy and Case Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, February.
    3. Kamil Urbanowicz & Anton Bergant & Apoloniusz Kodura & Michał Kubrak & Agnieszka Malesińska & Paweł Bury & Michał Stosiak, 2021. "Modeling Transient Pipe Flow in Plastic Pipes with Modified Discrete Bubble Cavitation Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:13:y:2020:i:5:p:1103-:d:327255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.