IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i5p782-d209271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance Degradation of Surface PMSMs with Demagnetization Defect under Predictive Current Control

Author

Listed:
  • Lynn Verkroost

    (Electrical Energy Laboratory, Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Flanders Make—EEDT, The Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Joachim Druant

    (Electrical Energy Laboratory, Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Flanders Make—EEDT, The Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Hendrik Vansompel

    (Electrical Energy Laboratory, Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Flanders Make—EEDT, The Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Frederik De Belie

    (Electrical Energy Laboratory, Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Flanders Make—EEDT, The Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Peter Sergeant

    (Electrical Energy Laboratory, Department of Electrical Energy, Metals, Mechanical Constructions and Systems, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
    Flanders Make—EEDT, The Strategic Research Centre for the Manufacturing Industry, 3001 Leuven, Belgium)

Abstract

To control the current of a surface mounted permanent magnet synchronous machine fed by a two-level voltage source inverter, a large variety of control algorithms exists. Each of these controllers performs differently concerning dynamic performance and control- and voltage quality, but also concerning sensitivity to demagnetization faults. Therefore, this paper investigates the performance degradation of three advanced predictive controllers under a partial demagnetization fault. The three predictive controllers are: finite-set model based predictive control, deadbeat control, and a combination of both previous algorithms. To achieve this goal, the three predictive controllers are first compared under healthy conditions, and afterwards under a partial demagnetization fault. A PI controller is added to the comparison in order to provide a model-independent benchmark. Key performance indicators, obtained from both simulations and experimental results on a 4 kW axial flux permanent magnet synchronous machine with yokeless and segmented armature topology, are introduced to enable a quantification of the performance degradation of the controllers under a demagnetization fault. A general conclusion is that the deadbeat controller shows superior control quality, even under partial demagnetization.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynn Verkroost & Joachim Druant & Hendrik Vansompel & Frederik De Belie & Peter Sergeant, 2019. "Performance Degradation of Surface PMSMs with Demagnetization Defect under Predictive Current Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:5:p:782-:d:209271
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/5/782/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/5/782/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guiping Du & Jiajian Li & Fada Du & Zhifei Liu, 2018. "A Robust Digital Control Strategy Using Error Correction Based on the Discrete Lyapunov Theorem," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Po Li & Ruiyu Li & Haifeng Feng, 2018. "Total Harmonic Distortion Oriented Finite Control Set Model Predictive Control for Single-Phase Inverters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Roh Chan & Sangshin Kwak, 2017. "Model-Based Predictive Current Control Method with Constant Switching Frequency for Single-Phase Voltage Source Inverters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Stefan Sjökvist & Sandra Eriksson, 2017. "Investigation of Permanent Magnet Demagnetization in Synchronous Machines during Multiple Short-Circuit Fault Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-12, October.
    5. Fang Hu & Derong Luo & Chengwei Luo & Zhuo Long & Gongping Wu, 2018. "Cascaded Robust Fault-Tolerant Predictive Control for PMSM Drives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Jian Li & Xiaoyan Huang & Feng Niu & Chaojie You & Lijian Wu & Youtong Fang, 2018. "Prediction Error Analysis of Finite-Control-Set Model Predictive Current Control for IPMSMs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    7. Jaehong Kim & Jitae Hong & Hongju Kim, 2016. "Improved Direct Deadbeat Voltage Control with an Actively Damped Inductor-Capacitor Plant Model in an Islanded AC Microgrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-15, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikola Lopac & Neven Bulic & Niksa Vrkic, 2019. "Sliding Mode Observer-Based Load Angle Estimation for Salient-Pole Wound Rotor Synchronous Generators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, April.
    2. En-Chih Chang & Chun-An Cheng & Lung-Sheng Yang, 2019. "Nonsingular Terminal Sliding Mode Control Based on Binary Particle Swarm Optimization for DC–AC Converters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Md Alamgir Hossain & Hemanshu Roy Pota & Walid Issa & Md Jahangir Hossain, 2017. "Overview of AC Microgrid Controls with Inverter-Interfaced Generations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Yan Xu & Tingna Shi & Yan Yan & Xin Gu, 2019. "Dual-Vector Predictive Torque Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors Based on a Candidate Vector Table," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Cheng-Kai Lin & Jen-te Yu & Hao-Qun Huang & Jyun-Ting Wang & Hsing-Cheng Yu & Yen-Shin Lai, 2018. "A Dual-Voltage-Vector Model-Free Predictive Current Controller for Synchronous Reluctance Motor Drive Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, July.
    6. Hyeong-Jun Yoo & Thai-Thanh Nguyen & Hak-Man Kim, 2019. "MPC with Constant Switching Frequency for Inverter-Based Distributed Generations in Microgrid Using Gradient Descent," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Yufeng Zhang & Zihui Wu & Qi Yan & Nan Huang & Guanghui Du, 2022. "An Improved Model−Free Current Predictive Control of Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor Based on High−Gain Disturbance Observer," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Jaime A. Rohten & David N. Dewar & Pericle Zanchetta & Andrea Formentini & Javier A. Muñoz & Carlos R. Baier & José J. Silva, 2021. "Multivariable Deadbeat Control of Power Electronics Converters with Fast Dynamic Response and Fixed Switching Frequency," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Wenjuan Zhang & Gongping Wu & Zhimeng Rao & Jian Zheng & Derong Luo, 2020. "Predictive Power Control of Novel N *3-phase PM Energy Storage Motor for Urban Rail Transit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Jonathan Sjölund & Sandra Eriksson, 2021. "Effect of Pole Shoe Design on Inclination Angle of Different Magnetic Fields in Permanent Magnet Machines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Zia Ullah & Jin Hur, 2018. "A Comprehensive Review of Winding Short Circuit Fault and Irreversible Demagnetization Fault Detection in PM Type Machines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, November.
    12. Mingcheng Lyu & Gongping Wu & Derong Luo & Fei Rong & Shoudao Huang, 2019. "Robust Nonlinear Predictive Current Control Techniques for PMSM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    13. Mariusz Baranski & Wojciech Szelag & Wieslaw Lyskawinski, 2020. "Analysis of the Partial Demagnetization Process of Magnets in a Line Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Zhimeng Rao & Wenjuan Zhang & Gongping Wu & Jian Zheng & Shoudao Huang, 2020. "Characteristic Analysis and Predictive Torque Control of the Modular Three-Phase PMSM for Low-Voltage High Power Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    15. Junlei Chen & Shuo Chen & Xiang Wu & Guojun Tan & Jianqi Hao, 2019. "A Super-Twisting Sliding-Mode Stator Flux Observer for Sensorless Direct Torque and Flux Control of IPMSM," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, July.
    16. Yuhan Zhang & Guiping Du & Jiajian Li & Yanxiong Lei, 2020. "Hybrid Control Strategy of MPC and DBC to Achieve a Fixed Frequency and Superior Robustness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    17. Yiguang Chen & Xuemin Chen & Yonghuan Shen, 2018. "On-Line Detection of Coil Inter-Turn Short Circuit Faults in Dual-Redundancy Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-31, March.
    18. Wenjuan Zhang & Yu Li & Gongping Wu & Zhimeng Rao & Jian Gao & Derong Luo, 2021. "Robust Predictive Power Control of N *3-Phase PMSM for Flywheel Energy Storage Systems Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Youn-Ok Choi & Jaehong Kim, 2017. "Output Impedance Control Method of Inverter-Based Distributed Generators for Autonomous Microgrid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    20. Amit Kumer Podder & Md. Habibullah & Md. Tariquzzaman & Eklas Hossain & Sanjeevikumar Padmanaban, 2020. "Power Loss Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic Integrated Model Predictive Control Based On-Grid Inverter," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:5:p:782-:d:209271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.