IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i12p1946-d120054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational Range of Several Interface Algorithms for Different Power Hardware-In-The-Loop Setups

Author

Listed:
  • Ron Brandl

    (Fraunhofer Institute of Wind Energy and Energy System Technology, 34121 Kassel, Germany)

Abstract

The importance of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop (PHIL) experiments is rising more and more over the last decade in the field of power system and components testing. Due to the bidirectional exchange between virtual and physical systems, a true-to-reality interface is essential; however, linking several dynamic systems, stability issues can challenge the experiments, the components under test, and the individuals performing the experiments. Over the time, several interface algorithms (IA) have been developed and analyzed, each having different advantages and disadvantages in view of combining virtual simulations with physical power systems. Finally, IA are very specific to the kind of PHIL experiment. This paper investigates the operational range of several IA for specific PHIL setups by calculations, simulations, and measurements. Therefore, a selection of the mainly used respectively optimized IA is mathematically described. The operational range is verified in a PHIL system testing environment. Furthermore, in order to study the influence of different PHIL setups, according to software and hardware impedance, different tests using linear and switching amplifiers are performed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ron Brandl, 2017. "Operational Range of Several Interface Algorithms for Different Power Hardware-In-The-Loop Setups," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:1946-:d:120054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/1946/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/12/1946/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Falko Ebe & Basem Idlbi & David E. Stakic & Shuo Chen & Christoph Kondzialka & Matthias Casel & Gerd Heilscher & Christian Seitl & Roland Bründlinger & Thomas I. Strasser, 2018. "Comparison of Power Hardware-in-the-Loop Approaches for the Testing of Smart Grid Controls," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Thomas I. Strasser & Sebastian Rohjans & Graeme M. Burt, 2019. "Methods and Concepts for Designing and Validating Smart Grid Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-5, May.
    3. Moiz Muhammad & Holger Behrends & Stefan Geißendörfer & Karsten von Maydell & Carsten Agert, 2021. "Power Hardware-in-the-Loop: Response of Power Components in Real-Time Grid Simulation Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, January.
    4. Juan Montoya & Ron Brandl & Keerthi Vishwanath & Jay Johnson & Rachid Darbali-Zamora & Adam Summers & Jun Hashimoto & Hiroshi Kikusato & Taha Selim Ustun & Nayeem Ninad & Estefan Apablaza-Arancibia & , 2020. "Advanced Laboratory Testing Methods Using Real-Time Simulation and Hardware-in-the-Loop Techniques: A Survey of Smart Grid International Research Facility Network Activities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-38, June.
    5. Annette von Jouanne & Emmanuel Agamloh & Alex Yokochi, 2023. "Power Hardware-in-the-Loop (PHIL): A Review to Advance Smart Inverter-Based Grid-Edge Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-27, January.
    6. Efren Guillo-Sansano & Mazheruddin H. Syed & Andrew J. Roscoe & Graeme M. Burt, 2018. "Initialization and Synchronization of Power Hardware-In-The-Loop Simulations: A Great Britain Network Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, April.
    7. Tania García-Sánchez & Irene Muñoz-Benavente & Emilio Gómez-Lázaro & Ana Fernández-Guillamón, 2020. "Modelling Types 1 and 2 Wind Turbines Based on IEC 61400-27-1: Transient Response under Voltage Dips," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:12:p:1946-:d:120054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.