IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v13y2025i9p264-d1745253.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Development Models and Transaction Costs: Empirical Evidence from Equity-Focused Versus Scale-Intensive Approaches in Emerging Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Yiu Fai Chan

    (International Foundation Year Programme, University of Salford, Maxwell Building, University Road, Salford M5 4WT, UK)

  • Yuvraj V. Bheekee

    (International Business Management, UoB Manchester, Base Building, Greenheys Lane, Manchester M15 6LR, UK)

Abstract

Research Problem: Despite growing recognition that digital transformation strategies affect economic coordination, no study has empirically tested whether different national digital development models create systematically different transaction cost environments, particularly in emerging economies pursuing Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Research Gap and Novelty: This study addresses a critical gap by providing the first comprehensive empirical validation of how equity-focused versus scale-intensive digital development strategies influence coordination efficiency outcomes. Unlike previous studies that focus on aggregate digital infrastructure investment or single-country analyses, we develop a novel multi-dimensional Digital Coordination Efficiency Index and systematic development model classification framework to test transaction cost economics (TCE) predictions across diverse emerging economy contexts. Methodology: Using panel data from 16 strategically selected emerging economies (2017–2022) representing distinct development pathways, we apply advanced econometric techniques including comprehensive diagnostic testing, jackknife analysis, and bootstrap procedures to ensure robust causal inference. Key Findings: Development model choice explains 63.4% of variation in digital coordination efficiency compared to only 8.9% explained by GDP per capita—a 7.1-fold improvement in explanatory power—though this finding is based on a limited sample of 16 countries. Countries pursuing equity-focused strategies achieve 15.42 points higher coordination efficiency ( p < 0.05) and demonstrate 49.4% superior mobile infrastructure penetration in our sample. The Vietnam–India comparison illustrates how an equity-focused model can systematically outperform a scale-intensive approach, with Vietnam achieving 68.4% higher GDP per capita, though we acknowledge this represents one specific case rather than a universal pattern. Practical Implications: Emerging economies can achieve superior economic outcomes by prioritizing digital inclusion over concentrated innovation, with equity-focused approaches providing measurable coordination advantages that translate into higher GDP growth and better SDG attainment. Multinational corporations should consider coordination capabilities when making location decisions, as equity-focused countries offer superior environments for distributed operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yiu Fai Chan & Yuvraj V. Bheekee, 2025. "Digital Development Models and Transaction Costs: Empirical Evidence from Equity-Focused Versus Scale-Intensive Approaches in Emerging Economies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:9:p:264-:d:1745253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/9/264/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/13/9/264/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Purva Khera & Stephanie Ng & Sumiko Ogawa & Ratna Sahay, 2022. "Measuring Digital Financial Inclusion in Emerging Market and Developing Economies: A New Index," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 17(2), pages 213-230, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daud, Siti Nurazira Mohd & Ahmad, Abd Halim, 2023. "Financial inclusion, economic growth and the role of digital technology," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    2. Oughton, Edward J. & Amaglobeli, David & Moszoro, Marian, 2023. "What would it cost to connect the unconnected? Estimating global universal broadband infrastructure investment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(10).
    3. Hua Zhang & Qiwang Zhang & Man An & Zixuan Zhang & Nanqiao He, 2023. "Unveiling the Impact of Digital Financial Inclusion on Low-Carbon Green Utilization of Farmland: The Roles of Farmland Transfer and Management Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Umair Kashif & Junguo Shi & Sihan Li & Qinqin Wu & Qiuya Song & Shanshan Dou & Mengjie Wei & Snovia Naseem, 2024. "Navigating the digital divide: unraveling the impact of ICT usage and supply on SO2 emissions in China’s Yangtze River Delta," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Shi, Yu & Dong, Xiaohong & Zhang, Qiyuan & Zhou, Ze, 2024. "FinTech, urban entrepreneurial activity, and social security levels: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    6. Mao Wu & Ying Ma & Yu Gao & Zhanhui Ji, 2024. "The impact of digital economy on income inequality from the perspective of technological progress-biased transformation: evidence from China," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 567-607, August.
    7. Rehman, Mubeen Abdur, 2024. "How has FinTech become a solution for minerals management?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Chunhua Xin & Shuangshuang Fan & Zihao Guo, 2024. "Can digital finance promote inclusive growth to meet sustainable development in China? A machine learning approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 26647-26677, October.
    9. Borjigin, Wuyunzhaola & He, Sarula & Xu, Huixian, 2025. "The role of digital financial inclusion in promoting common prosperity: Evidence from Inner Mongolia," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Liu, Yishuang & Huang, Jinpeng & Xu, Jianxiang & Xiong, Shufei, 2024. "Natural resource dependence and sustainable development policy: Insights from city-level analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Jun Wang & Xinyi Zhang & Yingying Deng & Jianmin Cao & Yuan Liang, 2024. "The Impact of Digital Inclusive Finance on the Sustainable Growth of Income of Herdsmen in China’s Pastoral Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Jiaqi Li, 2024. "Exploring the spatially heterogeneous impact of digital financial inclusion on rural economic development in China using remote sensing data and the MGWR model," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Mina-Madalina Toma, 2024. "The Role of Fintech in Driving Financial Inclusion: A Review of Literature," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 3, pages 334-343.
    14. Laima Okunevičiūtė Neverauskienė & Irena Danilevičienė & Gileta Labašauskienė, 2025. "An Assessment of Lithuania’s Financial Technology Development," FinTech, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Yiping Huang & Takatoshi Ito & Kazumasa Iwata & Colin McKenzie & Shujiro Urata, 2022. "Digital Finance in Asia: Editors' Overview," Asian Economic Policy Review, Japan Center for Economic Research, vol. 17(2), pages 163-182, July.
    16. Hasan, Morshadul & Hoque, Ariful & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul & Gasbarro, Dominic, 2024. "FinTech and sustainable development: A systematic thematic analysis using human- and machine-generated processing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PC).
    17. John Theal & Pavel Dvorak, 2024. "An index of digital financial participation for EU countries: Where does Luxembourg stand?," BCL working papers 191, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    18. Xiujie Tan & Si Cheng & Yishuang Liu, 2024. "Green digital finance and technology diffusion," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    19. Favourate Y. Mpofu, 2024. "Industry 4.0 in Finance, Digital Financial Services and Digital Financial Inclusion in Developing Countries: Opportunities, Challenges, and Possible Policy Responses," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 120-135, March.
    20. Hua Zhang & Ying Li & Hanxiaoxue Sun & Xiaohui Wang, 2023. "How Can Digital Financial Inclusion Promote High-Quality Agricultural Development? The Multiple-Mediation Model Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-19, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:13:y:2025:i:9:p:264-:d:1745253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.