IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v12y2024i2p48-d1338660.html

Development of Trade in Recyclable Raw Materials: Transition to a Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Olga Lingaitiene

    (Department of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio Av. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Aurelija Burinskiene

    (Department of Business Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio Av. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

Mechanisms for sectoral change in the economy are being used to move towards a circular economy. Trade in recycled raw materials could contribute to circular economy development and is treated as the main circular indicator used to monitor progress toward a circular economy. However, the research area surrounding the transition to a circular economy lacks adequate tools, as until now, the circular economy has been investigated from an evolutionary and ecological perspective. In the article, the authors conduct a study identifying important variables for trade in recycled raw materials as the main indicator of CE development. The authors propose a two-step methodology for researching the links between main trade in recyclables and circular economy indicators. The authors found correlations between trade in recyclables and private investments in circular economy sectors. The authors used panel data analysis, compiled a regression matrix, and formed a dynamic regression model. The statistical tests showed that the formed regression model has no significant autocorrelation and heteroscedasticity. The framework can be applied in practice to serve policymakers and the academic community interested in analyzing the move toward a circular economy and its main circular indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Olga Lingaitiene & Aurelija Burinskiene, 2024. "Development of Trade in Recyclable Raw Materials: Transition to a Circular Economy," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:48-:d:1338660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/2/48/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/12/2/48/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pati, Rupesh Kumar & Vrat, Prem & Kumar, Pradeep, 2006. "Economic analysis of paper recycling vis-a-vis wood as raw material," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 489-508, October.
    2. Y. Hossein Farzin, 2004. "Is an Exhaustible Resource Economy Sustainable?," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1), pages 33-46, February.
    3. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    4. Shunta Yamaguchi, 2018. "International Trade and the Transition to a More Resource Efficient and Circular Economy: A Concept Paper," OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers 2018/03, OECD Publishing.
    5. van Ruijven, Bas J. & van Vuuren, Detlef P. & Boskaljon, Willem & Neelis, Maarten L. & Saygin, Deger & Patel, Martin K., 2016. "Long-term model-based projections of energy use and CO2 emissions from the global steel and cement industries," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 15-36.
    6. Kannan Govindan & R. Sivakumar, 2016. "Green supplier selection and order allocation in a low-carbon paper industry: integrated multi-criteria heterogeneous decision-making and multi-objective linear programming approaches," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 243-276, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dumitru Alexandru Bodislav & Liviu Cătălin Moraru & Raluca Iuliana Georgescu & George Eduard Grigore & Oana Vlăduț & Gabriel Ilie Staicu & Alina Ștefania Chenic, 2025. "Recyclable Consumption and Its Implications for Sustainable Development in the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-36, April.
    2. Lyudmila Davidenko & Alexey Titkov & Nurzhanat Sherimova & Ansagan Beisembina, 2024. "Economic Aspects of Sustainable Development: Eco-Branding in Manufacturing Enterprises from Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fu Jia & Yan Jiang, 2018. "Sustainable Global Sourcing: A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Imad El Harraki & Mohammad Zoynul Abedin & Amine Belhadi & Sachin Kamble & Karim Zkik & Mustapha Oudani, 2024. "Data‐driven control and a prey–predator model for sourcing decisions in the low‐carbon intertwined supply chain," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 9141-9160, December.
    3. Chao Fu & Weiyong Liu & Wenjun Chang, 2020. "Data-driven multiple criteria decision making for diagnosis of thyroid cancer," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 833-862, October.
    4. Chunguang Bai & Kannan Govindan & Dileep Dhavale, 2024. "Optimal selection and investment-allocation decisions for sustainable supplier development practices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(1), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Aleksander Banasik & Jacqueline M. Bloemhof-Ruwaard & Argyris Kanellopoulos & G. D. H. Claassen & Jack G. A. J. Vorst, 2018. "Multi-criteria decision making approaches for green supply chains: a review," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 366-396, September.
    6. Ruben Heradio & David Fernandez-Amoros & Cristina Cerrada & Manuel J. Cobo, 2020. "Group Decision-Making Based on Artificial Intelligence: A Bibliometric Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-20, September.
    7. Ji Chen & Shouzhen Zeng & Chonghui Zhang, 2018. "An OWA Distance-Based, Single-Valued Neutrosophic Linguistic TOPSIS Approach for Green Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Low-Carbon Supply Chains," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Xiaojun Wang & Xu Chen & Christopher Durugbo & Ziming Cai, 2020. "Manage risk of sustainable product–service systems: a case-based operations research approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 897-920, August.
    9. Sara Sohrabi & Ali Husseinzadeh Kashan & Jalil Heidary Dahooie, 2025. "A Two-Sided Matching Model Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Resource Allocation in the Automotive Industry," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 1-43, December.
    10. Jafar Rezaei & Miłosz Kadziński & Chrysoula Vana & Lori Tavasszy, 2022. "Embedding carbon impact assessment in multi-criteria supplier segmentation using ELECTRE TRI-rC," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1445-1467, May.
    11. Jianquan Guo & Guanlan Wang & Zhen Wang & Chengji Liang & Mitsuo Gen, 2025. "Research on remanufacturing closed loop supply chain based on incentive-compatibility theory under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 349(2), pages 1203-1224, June.
    12. Sadia Samar Ali & Rajbir Kaur & D. Jinil Persis & Raiswa Saha & Murugan Pattusamy & V. Raja Sreedharan, 2023. "Developing a hybrid evaluation approach for the low carbon performance on sustainable manufacturing environment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 249-281, May.
    13. A. Mohammed, 2020. "Towards a sustainable assessment of suppliers: an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-possibilistic multi-objective approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 293(2), pages 639-668, October.
    14. Hadi Mokhtari & Mohammad Taghi Rezvan, 2020. "A single-supplier, multi-buyer, multi-product VMI production-inventory system under partial backordering," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 37-57, March.
    15. Kellner, Florian & Lienland, Bernhard & Utz, Sebastian, 2019. "An a posteriori decision support methodology for solving the multi-criteria supplier selection problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 505-522.
    16. Xingli Wu & Huchang Liao, 2022. "A gained and lost dominance score method with conflict analysis for green economy development evaluation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 316(1), pages 623-655, September.
    17. Aijun Liu & Senhao Luo & Jian Mou & Hongwei Qiu, 2023. "The antagonism and cohesion of the upstream supply chain under information asymmetry," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 329(1), pages 527-572, October.
    18. Suyuan Wang & Huaming Song & Yi Liao & Ali Diabat, 2025. "Low-carbon innovation with government subsidy for achieving SDGs in a complementary supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 352(1), pages 325-349, September.
    19. Hayk Manucharyan, 2020. "Dealing with uncertainties of green supplier selection: a fuzzy approach," Working Papers 2020-13, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    20. Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee & Zahra Dashtian & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber & Hana Tomaskova & Mehdi Soltani & Nasim Sadat Mousavi, 2021. "An Integrated Decision-Making Approach for Green Supplier Selection in an Agri-Food Supply Chain: Threshold of Robustness Worthiness," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-30, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:12:y:2024:i:2:p:48-:d:1338660. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.