IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v10y2025i9p136-d1730990.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A FAIR Perspective on Data Quality Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas Nicholson

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), I-21027 Ispra, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Raquel Negrao Carvalho

    (European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), I-21027 Ispra, Italy)

  • Iztok Štotl

    (Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
    Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Despite considerable effort and analysis over the last two to three decades, no integrated scenario yet exists for data quality frameworks. Currently, the choice is between several frameworks dependent upon the type and use of data. While the frameworks are appropriate to their specific purposes, they are generally prescriptive of the quality dimensions they prescribe. We reappraise the basis for measuring data quality by laying out a concept for a framework that addresses data quality from the foundational basis of the FAIR data guiding principles. We advocate for a federated data contextualisation framework able to handle the FAIR-related quality dimensions in the general data contextualisation descriptions and the remaining intrinsic data quality dimensions in associated dedicated context spaces without being overly prescriptive. A framework designed along these lines provides several advantages, not least of which is its ability to encapsulate most other data quality frameworks. Moreover, by contextualising data according to the FAIR data principles, many subjective quality measures are managed automatically and can even be quantified to a degree, whereas objective intrinsic quality measures can be handled to any level of granularity for any data type. This serves to avoid blurring quality dimensions between the data and the data application perspectives as well as to support data quality provenance by providing traceability over a chain of data processing operations. We show by example how some of these concepts can be implemented at a practical level.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas Nicholson & Raquel Negrao Carvalho & Iztok Štotl, 2025. "A FAIR Perspective on Data Quality Frameworks," Data, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:10:y:2025:i:9:p:136-:d:1730990
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/10/9/136/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/10/9/136/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hong Chen & David Hailey & Ning Wang & Ping Yu, 2014. "A Review of Data Quality Assessment Methods for Public Health Information Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-38, May.
    2. Russell Miller & Harvey Whelan & Michael Chrubasik & David Whittaker & Paul Duncan & João Gregório, 2024. "A Framework for Current and New Data Quality Dimensions: An Overview," Data, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-26, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Russell Miller & Harvey Whelan & Michael Chrubasik & David Whittaker & Paul Duncan & João Gregório, 2024. "A Framework for Current and New Data Quality Dimensions: An Overview," Data, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-26, December.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0190749 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis & Anastasios Michailidis & Christos Karelakis & Yannis Fallas & Aikaterini Paltaki, 2023. "What Makes Farmers Aware in Adopting Circular Bioeconomy Practices? Evidence from a Greek Rural Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Sapin, Maxime & Ehlig, David & Geissler, Alexander & Vogel, Justus, 2025. "Public reporting in five health care areas: A comparative content analysis across nine countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. David Naranjo-Gil & María Jesús Sánchez-Expósito & Laura Gómez-Ruiz, 2016. "Traditional vs. Contemporary Management Control Practices for Developing Public Health Policies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Syed Mustafa Ali & Farah Naureen & Arif Noor & Maged N. Kamel Boulos & Javariya Aamir & Muhammad Ishaq & Naveed Anjum & John Ainsworth & Aamna Rashid & Arman Majidulla & Irum Fatima, 2018. "Data Quality: A Negotiator between Paper-Based and Digital Records in Pakistan’s TB Control Program," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-16, July.
    7. Agatha Ravi Vidiasratri & Lisdrianto Hanindriyo & Caroline Manuela Hartanto, 2024. "Charting the Future of Oral Health: A Bibliometric Exploration of Quality-of-Life Research in Dentistry," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(3), pages 1-15, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:10:y:2025:i:9:p:136-:d:1730990. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.