IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jchals/v14y2023i1p6-d1032477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing Environmental Justice through the Integration of Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Environmental Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer B. Rasmussen

    (School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA)

Abstract

As our planet faces more frequent and severe environmental threats due to climate change (including threats to biodiversity), environmental justice will be essential to ensure that the costs and burdens of combating these threats are shared equally, borne by all people worldwide in a fair and equitable manner. If the past is any indicator, however, environmental problems—and their “solutions”—disproportionately affect poor communities and communities of color, including Indigenous communities. Despite these past injustices, Indigenous lands, which make up only 20 percent of the Earth’s territory, contain 80 percent of the world’s remaining biodiversity—evidence that Indigenous peoples are among the most effective stewards of the environment. A primary reason for this remarkable statistic is the use and practice of Indigenous Traditional Ecological Knowledge; ecological wisdom which has been passed down for generations and has been shown to strengthen community resilience in response to the multiple stressors of global environmental change. While the United States government has been slow to acknowledge the value of Traditional Ecological Knowledge, it has recently begun to incorporate that knowledge into environmental policy in response to the worldwide climate crisis. Continuing the integration of Traditional Ecological Knowledge into government environmental policy will ensure that such policies will be more effective at the federal, state, and local levels and more equitable in their application. Western scientists, government officials, and global leaders need to build trusting and co-equal relationships with Indigenous communities by actively listening to all cultures and respecting the many kinds of knowledge systems required to conserve the natural world and all living beings. This paper will address how incorporating Traditional Ecological Knowledge into U.S. policy would help safeguard the environment from further biodiversity loss and other ecological destruction, and advance environmental justice to ensure the fair treatment of all.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer B. Rasmussen, 2023. "Advancing Environmental Justice through the Integration of Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Environmental Policy," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:6-:d:1032477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/14/1/6/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/14/1/6/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadzirah Hosen & Hitoshi Nakamura & Amran Hamzah, 2020. "Adaptation to Climate Change: Does Traditional Ecological Knowledge Hold the Key?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcellus Mbah & Sandra Ajaps & Petra Molthan-Hill, 2021. "A Systematic Review of the Deployment of Indigenous Knowledge Systems towards Climate Change Adaptation in Developing World Contexts: Implications for Climate Change Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Daniele Conversi, 2021. "Exemplary Ethical Communities. A New Concept for a Livable Anthropocene," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Christine Samuel-Nakamura, 2020. "Using Traditional Methods for Collaborative Fieldwork in a Uranium Food Chain Study on Diné Lands in the US Southwest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Ruizi Yu & Quan Mu, 2023. "Integration of Indigenous and Local Knowledge in Policy and Practice of Nature-Based Solutions in China: Progress and Highlights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Hanjin Xie & Chunmei Yang & Yanping Liu, 2023. "Urban Ecological Culture Construction and the Formation of Residents’ Green Living: Evidence from National Forest City Construction in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Mashi, Sani Abubakar & Inkani, Amina Ibrahim & Oghenejabor, Obaro Dominic, 2022. "Determinants of awareness levels of climate smart agricultural technologies and practices of urban farmers in Kuje, Abuja, Nigeria," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Yayut Yishiuan Chen, 2020. "Decolonizing Methodologies, Situated Resilience, and Country: Insights from Tayal Country, Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    8. Rachel deHaan & Helen Hambly Odame & Naresh Thevathasan & Sarath P. Nissanka, 2020. "Local Knowledge and Perspectives of Change in Homegardens: A Photovoice Study in Kandy District, Sri Lanka," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Dian Charity Hidayat & Kosuke Mizuno & Chairil Abdini Abidin Said & Herdis Herdiansyah, 2023. "Implementation Framework for Transformation of Peat Ecosystems to Support Food Security," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Li-Yao Shien & Chih-Hsing Liu & Yi-Min Li, 2022. "How Positive and Negative Environmental Behaviours Influence Sustainable Tourism Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jchals:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:6-:d:1032477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.