IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jbusin/v2y2022i2p15-227d815492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Undergraduate Business Education: Using Learning Gain as a Measure to Compare Two Cohorts of Marketing Students

Author

Listed:
  • Helen O’Sullivan

    (Business School, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Martyn Polkinghorne

    (Business School, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK)

  • Julia Taylor

    (Doctoral College, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, UK)

Abstract

This paper considers management education and specifically how student learning has been impacted by the online replacement teaching offered by universities during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study utilizes a learning gain model which considers the students’ own perception of their learning, and separates the provision of theoretical explicit knowledge (distance travelled) from that of practical tacit understanding (journey travelled). In 2019, data were collected from a cohort of marketing students studying for an undergraduate UK business studies degree. In 2021, data were again collected from a new cohort of students studying the same business studies degree course, but this time during the COVID-19 period. A comparison was undertaken to identify any differences in learning gain. Overall, a drop in perceived learning was reported, although in a few areas, an indication of stronger learning was identified. Interestingly, female students reported the most significant drop in their learning related to journey travelled, whereas for male students, it related to distance travelled.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen O’Sullivan & Martyn Polkinghorne & Julia Taylor, 2022. "Investigating the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Undergraduate Business Education: Using Learning Gain as a Measure to Compare Two Cohorts of Marketing Students," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jbusin:v:2:y:2022:i:2:p:15-227:d:815492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7116/2/2/15/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7116/2/2/15/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martyn Polkinghorne & Gelareh Roushan & Julia Taylor, 2017. "Considering the marketing of higher education: the role of student learning gain as a potential indicator of teaching quality," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 213-232, July.
    2. Chris Chapleo & Helen O’Sullivan, 2017. "Contemporary thought in higher education marketing," Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 159-161, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Camille Kandiko Howson & Alex Buckley, 2020. "Quantifying Learning: Measuring Student Outcomes in Higher Education in England," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 6-14.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jbusin:v:2:y:2022:i:2:p:15-227:d:815492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.