IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v9y2019i7p135-d244576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response of the Durum Wheat Cultivar Um Qais ( Triticum turgidum subsp. durum ) to Salinity

Author

Listed:
  • Luma Hamdi

    (Department of Land, Water and Environment, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jordan, Queen Rania st, 11942 Amman, Jordan)

  • Ayman Suleiman

    (Department of Land, Water and Environment, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jordan, Queen Rania st, 11942 Amman, Jordan)

  • Gerrit Hoogenboom

    (Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering & Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Vakhtang Shelia

    (Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering & Institute for Sustainable Food Systems, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

Abstract

The threat of land degradation by salinization in Jordan has been increasing over the last decades. Therefore, information about the response of local cultivars to salinity is needed to help farmers choose the most productive cultivars for areas with salt-affected soils. A recently released durum wheat cultivar Um Qais ( Triticum turgidum subsp. durum ) has shown to be productive under normal conditions but to date there are no known studies on its tolerance to salinity. Two experiments were conducted to investigate the response of Um Qais cultivar to salinity. A field experiment was carried out in the Jordan Valley, which is known for its hot, dry climate during the summer and low rainfall and moderate temperature during the winter. Three water salinity levels (S): S1 (2 dS m −1 ), S2 (4 dS m −1 ), and S3 (8 dS m −1 ) with three irrigation amounts (R) (control = 120% (R1), 100% (R2), and 70% (R3)) were used in the field. A greenhouse experiment was conducted using four levels of saline water (S): S1 (0.65 dS m −1 ), S2 (4 dS m −1 ), S3 (8 dS m −1 ), and S4 (10 dS m −1 ). In both experiments, the leaf area index (LAI) and canopy height were measured during three growth stages, tillering, flag leaf, and maturity. The number of grains, grain yield, and above-ground biomass were measured after harvesting while soil salinity and pH were measured every three weeks during the growing season. The results showed that the maximum reduction in yield was of the 28% in the field experiment when the average soil salinity was of 6.8 ± 1.1 (standard error) dS m −1 at the middle stages of the season. Significant changes were shown in the treatments of the field experiments for maximum LAI, number of grains, and aboveground biomass, but not for plant height. For the greenhouse treatments, about 60% of the maximum grain yield was obtained when the average soil salinity was 9.94 ± 1.89 dS m −1 at the middle stage. Grain yield was the most sensitive parameter to the increase in soil salinity during the season. According to the findings of both experiments, Um Qais can be cultivated in moderately saline soils.

Suggested Citation

  • Luma Hamdi & Ayman Suleiman & Gerrit Hoogenboom & Vakhtang Shelia, 2019. "Response of the Durum Wheat Cultivar Um Qais ( Triticum turgidum subsp. durum ) to Salinity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:7:p:135-:d:244576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/7/135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/7/135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiaonan Yang & Can Hu & Jie Li & Xiaokang Yi & Yichuan He & Jie Zhang & Zhilin Sun, 2021. "A Separation and Desalination Process for Farmland Saline-Alkaline Water," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Lam Van Tan & Thanh Tran & Ho Huu Loc, 2020. "Soil and Water Quality Indicators of Diversified Farming Systems in a Saline Region of the Mekong Delta, Vietnam," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:7:p:135-:d:244576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.