IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v9y2019i3p66-d216895.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identification of Suitable Animal Welfare Assessment Measures for Extensive Beef Systems in New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Y. Baby Kaurivi

    (School of Veterinary Medicine, Massey University, Palmerston North 4471, New Zealand)

  • Richard Laven

    (School of Veterinary Medicine, Massey University, Palmerston North 4471, New Zealand)

  • Rebecca Hickson

    (School of Veterinary Medicine, Massey University, Palmerston North 4471, New Zealand)

  • Kevin Stafford

    (School of Veterinary Medicine, Massey University, Palmerston North 4471, New Zealand)

  • Tim Parkinson

    (School of Veterinary Medicine, Massey University, Palmerston North 4471, New Zealand)

Abstract

Farm animal welfare assessment protocols use different measures depending on production systems and the purpose of the assessment. There is no standardized validated animal welfare protocol for the assessment of beef cattle farms in New Zealand, despite the importance of beef exports to the country. The aim of this study was therefore to identify welfare measures that would be suitable for an animal welfare assessment protocol for use in extensive pasture-based cow–calf beef cattle systems in New Zealand. The proposed animal welfare assessment measures were selected from the Welfare Quality protocol and the rangeland-based UC Davis Cow–Calf Health and Handling assessment protocol. Measures that were deemed impractical and/or unsuitable were excluded from the protocol. After testing the applicability of selected measures at one farm, additional measures that were deemed to be practical to undertake in New Zealand were identified and incorporated into the protocol. The intention was to identify animal welfare indicators that were assessable in the yard during a single farm visit, a questionnaire guided interview, and a farm resource assessment visit that evaluated cattle health and management. Further testing of the 50 measures that were identified as being appropriate will be undertaken on commercial beef farms to develop a practicable welfare protocol for extensive pasture-based beef systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Y. Baby Kaurivi & Richard Laven & Rebecca Hickson & Kevin Stafford & Tim Parkinson, 2019. "Identification of Suitable Animal Welfare Assessment Measures for Extensive Beef Systems in New Zealand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:66-:d:216895
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/3/66/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/3/66/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:3:p:66-:d:216895. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.