IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v9y2019i1p21-d197614.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sulfur-Enriched Bone Char as Alternative P Fertilizer: Spectroscopic, Wet Chemical, and Yield Response Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Dana Zimmer

    (Soil Science, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, D-18051 Rostock, Germany
    Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Seestraße 15, 18119 Rostock, Germany)

  • Kerstin Panten

    (Julius Kühn Institute, Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Bundesallee 69, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Marcus Frank

    (Medical Biology and Electron Microscopic Centre, University Medicine Rostock, Strempelstraße 14, 18057 Rostock, Germany
    Department Life, Light & Matter—University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany)

  • Armin Springer

    (Medical Biology and Electron Microscopic Centre, University Medicine Rostock, Strempelstraße 14, 18057 Rostock, Germany)

  • Peter Leinweber

    (Soil Science, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, D-18051 Rostock, Germany
    Department Life, Light & Matter—University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany)

Abstract

Phosphorus- (P) rich bone char (BC) could be an alternative P fertilizer in sustainable agriculture; however, it has a low P solubility. Therefore, sulfur-enriched BC (BC plus ) was tested for chemical composition and fertilization effects in a pot experiment. In BC plus sulfur, concentrations increased from <0.1% to 27% and pH decreased from 8.6 to 5.0. These modifications did not change P solubility in water, neutral ammonium citrate, and citric acid. A pot experiment with annual rye grass ( Lolium multiflorum L.) and treatments without P (P0), BC, BC plus and triple superphosphate (TSP) was set up. The cumulative dry matter yield of the BC treatment was similar to P0, and that of BC plus similar to TSP. The plant P uptake was in the order P0 = BC < BC plus < TSP. Consequently, the apparent nutrient recovery efficiency differed significantly between BC (<3%), BC plus (10% to 15%), and TSP (>18%). The tested equilibrium extractions, regularly used to classify mineral P-fertilizers, failed to predict differences in plant yield and P uptake. Therefore, non-equilibrium extraction methods should be tested in combination with pot experiments. Additionally, particle-plant root scale analyses and long-term experiments are necessary to gain insights into fertilizer-plant interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Dana Zimmer & Kerstin Panten & Marcus Frank & Armin Springer & Peter Leinweber, 2019. "Sulfur-Enriched Bone Char as Alternative P Fertilizer: Spectroscopic, Wet Chemical, and Yield Response Evaluation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:21-:d:197614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/1/21/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/9/1/21/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:21-:d:197614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.