IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v8y2018i4p56-d140066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Importance of Agronomic Practice on the Control of Wheat Leaf Diseases

Author

Listed:
  • Biruta Bankina

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, LV-3001, Latvia)

  • Gunita Bimšteine

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, LV-3001, Latvia)

  • Irina Arhipova

    (Faculty of Information Technologies, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, LV-3001, Latvia)

  • Jānis Kaņeps

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, LV-3001, Latvia)

  • Terēze Stanka

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, LV-3001, Latvia)

Abstract

Soil tillage and crop rotation are considered important tools in wheat leaf disease control; however, the results of investigations are inconsistent. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of the soil tillage system and cropping sequence on the development of winter wheat leaf diseases in 2012–2017. The disease development was assessed in a two-factor experiment: (a) soil tillage system; and (b) crop rotation. Foliar fungicides were used uniformly in all variants. The results showed that tan spot (caused by Pyrenophora tritici-repentis ) dominated in 2012, 2013, and 2016, but the level of Septoria tritici blotch ( Zymoseptoria tritici ) was essentially lower and exceeded the severity of tan spot only in 2015. The agronomic practice used significantly influenced only the development of tan spot. Reduced soil tillage and continuous wheat sowing substantially increased tan spot severity, especially when both practices were used simultaneously. Short crop rotation (only wheat and oilseed rape) provided sufficient control of tan spot in ploughed fields, whereas in non-ploughed fields, the level of this disease did not decrease. The results could be explained by differences in the pathogens’ life cycle: P. tritici-repentis ascospores in wheat debris is the main source of infection; in contrast, Z . tritici spreads by conidia from living plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Biruta Bankina & Gunita Bimšteine & Irina Arhipova & Jānis Kaņeps & Terēze Stanka, 2018. "Importance of Agronomic Practice on the Control of Wheat Leaf Diseases," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-8, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:56-:d:140066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/4/56/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/8/4/56/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tim Birr & Mario Hasler & Joseph-Alexander Verreet & Holger Klink, 2021. "Temporal Changes in Sensitivity of Zymoseptoria tritici Field Populations to Different Fungicidal Modes of Action," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Salma Tissaoui & Noura Omri-Benyoussef & Hatem Chaar & Marwa Hassine & Jean-Stephane Venisse & Bouzid Nasraoui & Amira Mougou-Hamdane, 2023. "Progression of wheat Tan spot under different bioclimatic stages and agricultural practices," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(3), pages 233-244.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:8:y:2018:i:4:p:56-:d:140066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.