IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v7y2017i6p48-d100032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Microbial Carbon Substrate Utilization Differences among High- and Average-Yield Soybean Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Taylor C. Adams

    (Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, PTSC 115, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Kristofor R. Brye

    (Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, PTSC 115, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Mary C. Savin

    (Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, PTSC 115, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Jung Ae Lee

    (Agricultural Statistics Laboratory, AGRX 101, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Edward E. Gbur

    (Agricultural Statistics Laboratory, AGRX 101, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

Abstract

Since soybean ( Glycine max L. (Merr.)) yields greater than 6719 kg ha −1 have only recently and infrequently been achieved, little is known about the soil microbiological environment related to high-yield soybean production. Soil microbiological properties are often overlooked when assessing agronomic practices for optimal production. Therefore, a greater understanding is needed regarding how soil biological properties may differ between high- and average-yielding areas within fields. The objectives of this study were to (i) evaluate the effects of region on soil microbial carbon substrate utilization differences between high- (HY) and average-yield (AY) areas and (ii) assess the effect of yield area on selected microbiological property differences. Replicate soil samples were collected from the 0–10 cm depth from yield-contest-entered fields in close proximity that had both a HY and an AY area. Samples were collected immediately prior to or just after soybean harvest in 2014 and 2015 from each of seven geographic regions within Arkansas. Averaged across yield area, community-level carbon substrate utilization and Shannon’s and Simpson’s functional diversity and evenness were greater ( p < 0.05) in Region 7 than all other regions. Averaged across regions, Shannon’s functional diversity and evenness were greater ( p < 0.05) in HY than in AY areas. Principal component analysis demonstrated that a greater variety of carbon substrates were used in HY than AY areas. These results may help producers understand the soil microbiological environment in their own fields that contribute to or hinder achieving high-yielding soybeans; however, additional parameters may need to be assessed for a more comprehensive understanding of the soil environment that is associated with high-yielding soybean.

Suggested Citation

  • Taylor C. Adams & Kristofor R. Brye & Mary C. Savin & Jung Ae Lee & Edward E. Gbur, 2017. "Microbial Carbon Substrate Utilization Differences among High- and Average-Yield Soybean Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:7:y:2017:i:6:p:48-:d:100032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/6/48/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/7/6/48/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jarosław Grządziel & Karolina Furtak & Anna Gałązka, 2018. "Community-Level Physiological Profiles of Microorganisms from Different Types of Soil That Are Characteristic to Poland—A Long-Term Microplot Experiment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:7:y:2017:i:6:p:48-:d:100032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.