IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Evaluating Alternative Methods of Soil Erodibility Mapping in the Mediterranean Island of Crete

  • Christos G. Karydas

    ()

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Laboratory of Forest Management and Remote Sensing, Mouschounti & Dimokritou str., 55134 Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Marinos Petriolis

    ()

    (Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania, Department of Geoinformation in Environmental Management, Makedonias 1, 73100 Chania, Greece)

  • Ioannis Manakos

    ()

    (Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Information Technologies Institute, 6th km Xarilaou-Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece)

Registered author(s):

    Soil erodibility is among the trickiest erosion factors to estimate. This is especially true for heterogeneous Mediterranean environments, where reliable and dense soil data are rarely available, and interpolation methods give very low accuracies. Towards estimating soil erodibility, research so far has resulted in several alternatives mainly based on empirical formulas, on physics-based equations or on inference with expertise. The aim of this work was to compare erodibility patterns derived by using the empirical United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) formula and by inference from a geological map in a Mediterranean agricultural site. The Kolymvari area, located in the western part of Crete, an area covered by olive groves and citrus orchards, was selected as the study site for this work. Comparison of the spatial patterns of soil erodibility derived from the two alternatives showed significant differences ( i.e. , a mean normalized difference value of 0.52), while a test of the “inference” alternative indicated very low accuracies (0.1475 RMS error). A comparison, however, of the spatial patterns of erosion values derived from both alternatives indicated that dissimilarities of the two soil erodibility maps faded out. Moreover, the highly risky areas provided by both alternatives were found to be identical for 88% of the whole study site.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/3/362/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/3/362/
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by MDPI, Open Access Journal in its journal Agriculture.

    Volume (Year): 3 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 3 (July)
    Pages: 362-380

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:3:y:2013:i:3:p:362-380:d:26917
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.mdpi.com/

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:3:y:2013:i:3:p:362-380:d:26917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.