IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v1y2011i1p4-21d15151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Location Study of Soil Enzyme Activities as Affected by Types and Rates of Manure Application and Tillage Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Veronica Acosta-Martinez

    (Cropping Systems Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, 3810 4th Street, Lubbock, TX 79415, USA)

  • Maysoon M. Mikha

    (Central Great Plains Research Station, USDA-ARS, 40335 County Road GG, Akron, CO 80720, USA)

  • Karamat R. Sistani

    (Animal Waste Management Research Unit, USDA-ARS, 230 Bennett Lane, Bowling Green, KY 42104, USA)

  • Phillip W. Stahlman

    (Agricultural Research Center—Hays, Kansas State University, 1232 240th Avenue, Hays, KS 67601, USA)

  • Joseph G. Benjamin

    (Central Great Plains Research Station, USDA-ARS, 40335 County Road GG, Akron, CO 80720, USA)

  • Merle F. Vigil

    (Central Great Plains Research Station, USDA-ARS, 40335 County Road GG, Akron, CO 80720, USA)

  • Richie Erickson

    (The Institute of Environmental and Human Health (TIEHH), Texas Tech University, Reese Technology Center Building 555, 1207 Gilbert Drive, Lubbock, TX 79416, USA)

Abstract

Significant amounts of manure are produced in the USA; however, information on the changes in ecosystem services related to soil biogeochemical cycling for agroecosystems supported with organic amendments such as manure is limited. A multi-location field study was initiated in Colorado (CO), Kansas (KS) and Kentucky (KY), USA in loam soils to evaluate the effects of manure and tillage practices on enzyme activities that are key to biogeochemical cycling such as β-glucosidase (C cycling), α-galactosidase (C cycling), β-glucosaminidase (C and N cycling) and phosphomonoesterases (P cycling). The treatments were as follows: (i) two years of beef manure applications to a fine sandy loam at different rates (control: 0, low: 34 kg N ha −1 and high: 96 kg N ha −1 ) and tillage practices in CO; (ii) three years of beef manure applications to a silt loam at different rates (0, low: 67 kg N ha −1 and high: 134 kg N ha −1 ) and tillage practices in KS and; (iii) three years of poultry and dairy manure applications to a silt loam with different tillage practices at the same rate (403 kg N ha −1 ) in KY. Tillage practices (none vs. conventional) had no effect on the enzyme activities. Principal Component Analyses (PCA) grouped all enzyme activities with the high beef manure application rate after the first year in CO at 0–5 cm. By the second year, the low and high beef manure rates differed in enzyme activities for the KS soil with no difference between the low rate and control in CO. Since the first year of the KY study, acid phosphatase activity was greater in the poultry treated soil compared to dairy or the control; whereas, C cycling enzyme activities were similar in soil treated with dairy or poultry manure. For all studies, PCAs for soil samples from 5–10 cm depth did not reveal treatment separation until the second year, i.e. , only high application rate differed from the other treatments. Results of the study indicated significant responses in C and P cycling enzyme activities to manure applications within two years, suggesting potential benefits to soil biogeochemical cycling essential for the productivity of agroecosystems supported with organic fertilizers.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronica Acosta-Martinez & Maysoon M. Mikha & Karamat R. Sistani & Phillip W. Stahlman & Joseph G. Benjamin & Merle F. Vigil & Richie Erickson, 2011. "Multi-Location Study of Soil Enzyme Activities as Affected by Types and Rates of Manure Application and Tillage Practices," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-18, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:1:y:2011:i:1:p:4-21:d:15151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/1/1/4/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/1/1/4/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:1:y:2011:i:1:p:4-21:d:15151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.