Author
Listed:
- Yuefeng Yu
(Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China)
- Hongqin Tang
(Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China)
- Yuning Wang
(Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China)
- Wenbin Dong
(Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China)
- Zhongyi Li
(Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China)
- Caihui Wei
(Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China)
- Hai Liang
(Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China)
- Tieguang He
(Guangxi Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning 530007, China)
Abstract
In karst agroecosystems, the stability of soil organic carbon (SOC), which is essential for sustainable land management, is strongly influenced by the carbonate parent material. However, how land use and lithology interactively affect the vertical distribution and stabilization of SOC fractions remains unknown. This study investigated the vertical distribution (0–70 cm) of SOC fractions (particulate, POC; mineral–associated, MOC; recalcitrant, ROC; microbial biomass, MBC; dissolved, DOC; permanganate–oxidizable, LOC) in paddy and upland systems overlying limestone and dolomite. Results showed that land use and lithology jointly determined depth–dependent patterns of SOC fractions. The key finding was a depth–dependent reversal of land use effects: paddy soils had higher concentrations of SOC fractions (especially MBC and LOC) in the top 0–20 cm, whereas upland soils had higher concentrations of DOC, ROC, and POC below 50 cm. This pattern underscores an overlooked deep carbon sequestration potential in aerated uplands. Furthermore, lithology exerted fundamental control on SOC stability, with limestone soils exhibiting higher MOC/SOC and MOC/POC ratios than dolomite soils, indicating stronger organo–mineral association. Random Forest and Structural Equation Modeling revealed that soil aggregate stability is a key factor influencing the stability of SOC. These findings demonstrate that effective SOC management in karst agroecosystems must consider both surface land use decisions and deep lithological constraints. Specifically, promoting aggregate stability offers a more targeted pathway for long–term carbon stabilization in these ecologically fragile agricultural systems.
Suggested Citation
Yuefeng Yu & Hongqin Tang & Yuning Wang & Wenbin Dong & Zhongyi Li & Caihui Wei & Hai Liang & Tieguang He, 2026.
"Land Use and Lithology Drive Divergent Vertical Distribution and Stabilization of Soil Organic Carbon Fractions in Karst Agroecosystems,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-21, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:16:y:2026:i:14:p:1495-:d:1987294
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:16:y:2026:i:14:p:1495-:d:1987294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.