Author
Listed:
- Zitao Fan
(College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
These authors have an equal contribution to this work.)
- Sha He
(College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
These authors have an equal contribution to this work.)
- Qingjie Lin
(College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
These authors have an equal contribution to this work.)
- Shiying Lin
(College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Luwei Zhu
(College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Rui Yang
(College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Bingxia Chen
(College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Dingcheng Ye
(Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350013, China)
- Pingting Guo
(College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the impacts of brewer’s grains (BG) on growth performance, apparent nutrient digestibility, immunity, antioxidant capacity, and fecal microbiota of Simmental crossbred cattle and the economic benefits. A completely randomized design was adopted in our study. Twenty-four 15-month-old finishing Simmental crossbred male cattle (body weight, 433.43 ± 32.47 kg) were randomly assigned to three groups: control group (basal diet), 10% BG group (supplemented with 10% BG on a dry matter basis), and 15% BG group (supplemented with 15% BG on a dry matter basis). The trial lasted for 48 days, with serum samples collected on days 24 and 48 and fecal samples collected from days 46 to 48. Diets did not influence the average daily gain, dry matter intake, feed efficiency, and serum antioxidant parameters ( p > 0.05). The 15% BG group showed significantly higher acid detergent fiber digestibility ( p < 0.01) and elevated serum albumin levels on day 48 ( p = 0.047) compared with the control group. As for fecal microbiota, there was a lower Chao index ( p = 0.040) and a higher abundance of Romboutsia in the 15% BG group ( p = 0.025). Moreover, the feed costs of cattle fell by 9.34% and 14.66% after 10% and 15% BG supplementation, respectively. On the whole, BG supplementation demonstrated no significant effects on growth performance or animal health in finishing cattle. The 15% inclusion level demonstrated the greatest cost reduction potential. We, therefore, recommend adopting 15% BG supplementation as the optimal strategy to enhance economic returns in cattle production systems.
Suggested Citation
Zitao Fan & Sha He & Qingjie Lin & Shiying Lin & Luwei Zhu & Rui Yang & Bingxia Chen & Dingcheng Ye & Pingting Guo, 2025.
"Brewer’s Grains on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Metabolites, and Fecal Microbiota in Simmental Crossbred Cattle Finished in Feedlot,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:977-:d:1646773
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:977-:d:1646773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.