Author
Listed:
- Stefano Puccio
(Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences (SAAF), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy)
- Daniele Miccichè
(Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences (SAAF), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy)
- Gonçalo Victorino
(Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF), Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal)
- Carlos Manuel Lopes
(Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food (LEAF), Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal)
- Rosario Di Lorenzo
(Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences (SAAF), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy)
- Antonino Pisciotta
(Department of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences (SAAF), University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, 90128 Palermo, Italy)
Abstract
Pruning wood mass is crucial for grapevine management, as it reflects the vine’s vigor and balance. However, traditional manual measurement methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive. Recent advances in digital imaging offer non-invasive techniques, but limited research has explored pruning wood weight estimation, especially regarding the use of artificial backgrounds and lighting. This study assesses the use of image analysis for estimating wood weight, focusing on image acquisition conditions. This research aimed to (i) evaluate the necessity of artificial backgrounds and (ii) identify optimal daylight conditions for accurate image capture. Results demonstrated that estimation accuracy strongly depends on the sun’s position relative to the camera. The highest accuracy was achieved when the camera faced direct sunlight (morning on the northwest canopy side and afternoon on the southeast side), with R 2 values reaching 0.90 and 0.93, and RMSE as low as 44.24 g. Artificial backgrounds did not significantly enhance performance, suggesting that the method is applicable under field conditions. Leave-One-Group-Out Cross-Validation (LOGOCV) confirmed the model’s robustness when applied to Catarratto cv. (LOGOCV R 2 = 0.86 in NB and 0.84 in WB), though performance varied across other cultivars. These findings highlight the potential of automated image-based assessment for efficient vineyard management, using minimal effort adjustments to image collection that can be incorporated into low-cost setups for pruning wood weight estimation.
Suggested Citation
Stefano Puccio & Daniele Miccichè & Gonçalo Victorino & Carlos Manuel Lopes & Rosario Di Lorenzo & Antonino Pisciotta, 2025.
"Estimating Pruning Wood Mass in Grapevine Through Image Analysis: Influence of Light Conditions and Acquisition Approaches,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:966-:d:1645666
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:966-:d:1645666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.