Author
Listed:
- Haowei Liu
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
Intelligent Equipment Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)
- Xiu Wang
(Intelligent Equipment Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
National Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Equipment for Agriculture (NERCIEA), Beijing 100097, China)
- Jian Song
(Intelligent Equipment Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China
Beijing PAIDE Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd., Beijing 100097, China)
- Mingzhou Chen
(Intelligent Equipment Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)
- Cuiling Li
(Intelligent Equipment Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097, China)
- Changyuan Zhai
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
National Engineering Research Center of Intelligent Equipment for Agriculture (NERCIEA), Beijing 100097, China)
Abstract
Issues of poor real-time performance and low accuracy in the detection of load volume in the hopper during the mechanized harvesting of wine grapes are addressed in this study through the development of a proposed volume detection method based on ultrasonic sensors. First, the ultrasonic sensor beamwidth and detection height were determined through calibration tests. Next, a test bench was used to explore the influence of the number of ultrasonic sensors and conveying speed on the detected grape pile height. Data-based regression and hopper configuration-based geometric models correlating grape load volume with detected pile height were subsequently constructed; their accuracies were compared using test bench experiments to identify the optimal detection scheme. The regression model was more accurate than the geometric model under the considered conveying speeds with a maximum relative error of 8.0% for the former. Finally, field tests determined that the average grape load volume detection error during actual harvesting was 14.4%. Therefore, this study provides an effective solution for the detection of grape load volume in the hopper during mechanized harvesting and establishes a theoretical basis for the development of intelligent grape harvesting methods.
Suggested Citation
Haowei Liu & Xiu Wang & Jian Song & Mingzhou Chen & Cuiling Li & Changyuan Zhai, 2025.
"Non-Contact Detection of Wine Grape Load Volume in Hopper During Mechanical Harvesting,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:918-:d:1640437
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:918-:d:1640437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.