Author
Listed:
- Qi Yan
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China
Science and Technology Backyard of Guangxi Fusui Dairy Industry, Chongzuo 532100, China)
- Hao Ding
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China
Science and Technology Backyard of Guangxi Fusui Dairy Industry, Chongzuo 532100, China)
- Chenghuan Qin
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China
Science and Technology Backyard of Guangxi Fusui Dairy Industry, Chongzuo 532100, China)
- Qichao Gu
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China
Science and Technology Backyard of Guangxi Fusui Dairy Industry, Chongzuo 532100, China)
- Xin Gao
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China
Science and Technology Backyard of Guangxi Fusui Dairy Industry, Chongzuo 532100, China)
- Yongqi Tan
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China
Science and Technology Backyard of Guangxi Fusui Dairy Industry, Chongzuo 532100, China)
- Deshuang Wei
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China)
- Yiqiang Li
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China)
- Nanji Zhang
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China
Science and Technology Backyard of Guangxi Fusui Dairy Industry, Chongzuo 532100, China)
- Ruizhanghui Wang
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China
Science and Technology Backyard of Guangxi Fusui Dairy Industry, Chongzuo 532100, China)
- Bo Lin
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China
Science and Technology Backyard of Guangxi Fusui Dairy Industry, Chongzuo 532100, China)
- Caixia Zou
(College of Animal Science and Technology, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Animal Breeding, Disease Control and Prevention, Nanning 530004, China
Science and Technology Backyard of Guangxi Fusui Dairy Industry, Chongzuo 532100, China)
Abstract
In this study, we investigated whether epiphytic microorganisms of fresh forage affect silage quality and aerobic exposure of silage by determining the changes in chemical composition, fermentation characteristics and microbial population of two grass forages (sugarcane tops and corn stover) under aerobic exposure treatments (fresh, end-of-storage and aerobic exposure periods). There were nine replicates for each of the two forage silages. The total silage time was 60 days, after which the cellar was opened for a 12-day period for aerobic exposure measurements. At the end of ensiling, the lactic acid content of corn stover silage (116.78 g/kg DM) was significantly higher than that of sugarcane top silage (16.07 g/kg DM; p < 0.01), and the corn stover (3.53) had a significantly lower pH than sugarcane tops (4.46) ( p < 0.01). Weissella was the most abundant epiphytic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in sugarcane tops and corn stover (19.08% and 11.15%, respectively). The relative abundance of epiphytic Pediococcus was higher in sugarcane tops (0.17%) than in corn stover (0.09%; p < 0.05). The relative abundance of Pediococcus was significantly higher in sugarcane top silage (2.24%) than in corn stover silage during the aerobic exposure period ( p < 0.01). The acetic acid content of corn stover silage was significantly reduced during aerobic exposure ( p < 0.01) due to the abundance of Paenibacillus (62.38%). The fungal genus Candida affected the aerobic exposure of sugarcane top (37.88%) and corn stover silage (73.52%). In summary, Weissella was the genus of lactic acid bacteria present in the highest abundance in sugarcane tops and corn stover, favoring early and rapid acidification. In addition, Candiada , which consumes organic acids in large numbers, was the fungal genus that influenced the aerobic exposure of sugarcane top silage versus corn stover silage.
Suggested Citation
Qi Yan & Hao Ding & Chenghuan Qin & Qichao Gu & Xin Gao & Yongqi Tan & Deshuang Wei & Yiqiang Li & Nanji Zhang & Ruizhanghui Wang & Bo Lin & Caixia Zou, 2025.
"Influence of Epiphytic Microorganisms on Silage Quality and Aerobic Exposure Characteristics of Grass Pastures,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:890-:d:1638097
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Na Zhao & Xia Hao & Maozhe Yin & Changqing Li & Chao Wang & Hongyan Han, 2024.
"Influence of Growth Stages and Additives on the Fermentation Quality and Microbial Profiles of Whole-Plant Millet Silage,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, August.
- Siran Wang, 2025.
"Silage Preparation, Processing and Efficient Utilization,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-5, January.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:890-:d:1638097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.