IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i8p807-d1630569.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MKD8: An Enhanced YOLOv8 Model for High-Precision Weed Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxuan Su

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Wenzhong Yang

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
    Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Multilingual Information Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Jiajia Wang

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Doudou Ren

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Danny Chen

    (School of Computer Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

Abstract

Weeds are an inevitable element in agricultural production, and their significant negative impacts on crop growth make weed detection a crucial task in precision agriculture. The diversity of weed species and the substantial background noise in weed images pose considerable challenges for weed detection. To address these challenges, constructing a high-quality dataset and designing an effective artificial intelligence model are essential solutions. We captured 2002 images containing 10 types of weeds from cotton and corn fields, establishing the CornCottonWeed dataset, which provides rich data support for weed-detection tasks. Based on this dataset, we developed the MKD8 model for weed detection. To enhance the model’s feature extraction capabilities, we designed the CVM and CKN modules, which effectively alleviate the issues of deep-feature information loss and the difficulty in capturing fine-grained features, enabling the model to more accurately distinguish between different weed species. To suppress the interference of background noise, we designed the ASDW module, which combines dynamic convolution and attention mechanisms to further improve the model’s ability to differentiate and detect weeds. Experimental results show that the MKD8 model achieved mAP 50 and mAP [50:95] of 88.6% and 78.4%, respectively, on the CornCottonWeed dataset, representing improvements of 9.9% and 8.5% over the baseline model. On the public weed dataset CottoWeedDet12, the mAP 50 and mAP [50:95] reached 95.3% and 90.5%, respectively, representing improvements of 1.0% and 1.4% over the baseline model.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxuan Su & Wenzhong Yang & Jiajia Wang & Doudou Ren & Danny Chen, 2025. "MKD8: An Enhanced YOLOv8 Model for High-Precision Weed Detection," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:807-:d:1630569
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/8/807/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/8/807/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hui Zhang & Zhi Wang & Yufeng Guo & Ye Ma & Wenkai Cao & Dexin Chen & Shangbin Yang & Rui Gao, 2022. "Weed Detection in Peanut Fields Based on Machine Vision," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiangwu Deng & Long Qi & Zhuwen Liu & Song Liang & Kunsong Gong & Guangjun Qiu, 2023. "Weed target detection at seedling stage in paddy fields based on YOLOX," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(12), pages 1-22, December.
    2. Marios Vasileiou & Leonidas Sotirios Kyrgiakos & Christina Kleisiari & Georgios Kleftodimos & George Vlontzos & Hatem Belhouchette & Panos M. Pardalos, 2024. "Transforming weed management in sustainable agriculture with artificial intelligence: a systematic literature review towards weed identification and deep learning," Post-Print hal-04297703, HAL.
    3. Shanxin Zhang & Hao Feng & Shaoyu Han & Zhengkai Shi & Haoran Xu & Yang Liu & Haikuan Feng & Chengquan Zhou & Jibo Yue, 2022. "Monitoring of Soybean Maturity Using UAV Remote Sensing and Deep Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Xinle Zhang & Jian Cui & Huanjun Liu & Yongqi Han & Hongfu Ai & Chang Dong & Jiaru Zhang & Yunxiang Chu, 2023. "Weed Identification in Soybean Seedling Stage Based on Optimized Faster R-CNN Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Jibo Yue & Chengquan Zhou & Haikuan Feng & Yanjun Yang & Ning Zhang, 2023. "Novel Applications of Optical Sensors and Machine Learning in Agricultural Monitoring," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-4, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:807-:d:1630569. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.