IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i23p2467-d1805439.html

Spray Deposition, Drift and Equipment Contamination for Drone and Conventional Orchard Spraying Under European Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Artur Godyń

    (National Institute of Horticultural Research, Department of Agroengineering–Skierniewice, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland)

  • Waldemar Świechowski

    (National Institute of Horticultural Research, Department of Agroengineering–Skierniewice, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Doruchowski

    (National Institute of Horticultural Research, Department of Agroengineering–Skierniewice, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland)

  • Ryszard Hołownicki

    (National Institute of Horticultural Research, Department of Agroengineering–Skierniewice, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland)

  • Andrzej Bartosik

    (National Institute of Horticultural Research, Department of Agroengineering–Skierniewice, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland)

  • Konrad Sas

    (National Institute of Horticultural Research, Department of Agroengineering–Skierniewice, 96-100 Skierniewice, Poland)

Abstract

In Europe, there is a growing interest in crop spraying using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs, drones), although current legislation imposes significant limitations on this technique. Spraying of orchard crops with drones remains particularly challenging due to the risks of spray drift and insufficient deposition uniformity. This study evaluated spray deposition within tree canopies (in two application terms), airborne and sediment drift losses, and contamination of the spraying equipment. The performance of a medium-sized drone (ABZ Innovation L10, maximum take-off weight 29 kg) was compared at flight speeds of 1.8, 2.7, and 3.6 m·s −1 with that of a conventional orchard sprayer (Munckhof axial sprayer with column attachment, operating at 1.7 m·s −1 ). A fluorescent tracer (BF7G, 1200 g·ha −1 ) was used in all trials, with spray volume rates of 27 or 40 L·ha −1 for the drone and 400 L·ha −1 for the sprayer. In most cases, deposition within the tree canopy was significantly lower for the drone. Poor uniformity of spray distribution was observed, especially between the upper and lower surfaces of collector plates with attached filter papers and between the top and bottom canopy zones. Airborne drift increased significantly with higher drone flight speeds, while sediment drift decreased. At 1.8 m·s −1 , both drift types were comparable to those from the conventional sprayer. Drone surface contamination was several times lower than that of the ground sprayer, even when accounting for differences in equipment surface area.

Suggested Citation

  • Artur Godyń & Waldemar Świechowski & Grzegorz Doruchowski & Ryszard Hołownicki & Andrzej Bartosik & Konrad Sas, 2025. "Spray Deposition, Drift and Equipment Contamination for Drone and Conventional Orchard Spraying Under European Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-27, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:23:p:2467-:d:1805439
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/23/2467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/23/2467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:23:p:2467-:d:1805439. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.