IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i19p2053-d1761639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Energy Simulation-Driven Life-Cycle Costing of Gobi Solar Greenhouses: Stakeholder-Focused Analysis for Tomato Production

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodan Zhang

    (College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jianming Xie

    (College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Ning Ma

    (College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Youlin Chang

    (College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jing Zhang

    (College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jing Li

    (College of Horticulture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Sustainable agricultural production systems are a global consensus. Their life-cycle economic feasibility is essential for long-term sustainable goals. This study integrates life-cycle costing with building energy simulation to assess the cost performance of conventional and innovative greenhouse tomato production systems in China’s Hexi Corridor, using dynamic thermal load modeling to overcome empirical-data limitations in traditional life-cycle costing. Under the facility-lease farming model, construction companies incur life-cycle costs of CNY 10.53·m −2 ·yr −1 for the conventional concrete-walled Gobi solar greenhouse and CNY 10.45·m −2 ·yr −1 for the innovative flexible insulation-walled Gobi solar greenhouses. However, farmer greenhouse contractors achieve 10.5% lower life-cycle costs for tomato cultivation in the conventional structure (CNY 2.87·kg −1 ·yr −1 ) than in the innovative one (CNY 3.21·kg −1 ·yr −1 ) due to 52.6% heating energy savings from the integrated active solar thermal systems. Furthermore, life-cycle cash flow analysis confirms construction companies incur non-viable returns, while farmers achieve substantial profits, with 52.5% higher cumulative profits obtained in the conventional greenhouse than the innovative greenhouse. This profit allocation imbalance threatens sustainability. Our pioneering stakeholder-perspective assessment provides evidence-based strategies for government, investors, and farmers to optimize resource allocation and promote sustainable Gobi agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodan Zhang & Jianming Xie & Ning Ma & Youlin Chang & Jing Zhang & Jing Li, 2025. "Energy Simulation-Driven Life-Cycle Costing of Gobi Solar Greenhouses: Stakeholder-Focused Analysis for Tomato Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2053-:d:1761639
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2053/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2053/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2053-:d:1761639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.