IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i19p2050-d1761468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Indoor Temperature, Relative Humidity, and Carbon Dioxide Conditions on Wean-to-Finish Swine Survivability

Author

Listed:
  • Olivia J. Kittle

    (Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, 120 W Broughton Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA)

  • Mark T. Knauer

    (Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, 120 W Broughton Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA)

  • Glen W. Almond

    (College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA)

  • Apostolos Stamenos

    (Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, 2311 Stinson Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA)

  • Laura Kushner

    (Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, 2311 Stinson Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA)

  • Simon Weisenhorn

    (Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, 2311 Stinson Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA)

  • Suzanne M. Leonard

    (Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, 120 W Broughton Drive, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA)

Abstract

In swine production, it is broadly recognized that ventilation rates and indoor environmental conditions influence pig productivity. However, sparse scientific data are available on the combined effects and potential interactions of these factors in commercial production systems. This study investigated indoor environmental and management factors influencing wean-to-finish pig mortality in a commercial system. Temperature, relative humidity (RH), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) were recorded every 10 min in the front and back of 16 barns across five grow-finish sites in eastern North Carolina for two turns (four barns) or three turns (12 barns) for a total of 44 pig groups. Proportional weekly mortality was modeled using a generalized linear mixed model. Results showed that pigs in environments warmer than the desired room temperature had lower mortality ( p < 0.001), suggesting cold stress was more detrimental than heat stress. Elevated RH and CO 2 at the back of the barn were linked to increased mortality ( p < 0.001), highlighting air exchange rates as a key indicator. Mortality was greatest in pig groups placed during Spring and lowest in Summer ( p < 0.05), and mortality declined as pigs aged ( p = 0.0134). Surprisingly, greater barn occupancy correlated with lower mortality ( p = 0.0012), potentially related to piglet quality at placement. The predictive power of the model varied with the turn of pigs, with R 2 averaging 0.24 (ranging from 0.001 to 0.61) and an average RMSE of 0.36% (ranging from 0.17% to 0.77%). Ammonia (NH 3 ) was recorded at the back of six barns, and concentrations were modeled. Greater NH 3 concentrations were associated with increased pig age, RH, and CO 2 , as well as lower deviation from desired room temperature and lower barn occupancy. Collectively, these findings highlight the importance of proper ventilation and management on swine productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivia J. Kittle & Mark T. Knauer & Glen W. Almond & Apostolos Stamenos & Laura Kushner & Simon Weisenhorn & Suzanne M. Leonard, 2025. "Effects of Indoor Temperature, Relative Humidity, and Carbon Dioxide Conditions on Wean-to-Finish Swine Survivability," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2050-:d:1761468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2050/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2050/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2050-:d:1761468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.