IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i19p2030-d1759888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Synergistic Control Efficiency of Multi-Dimensional Best Management Practices Based on the HYPE Model for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Pollution in Rural Small Watersheds

Author

Listed:
  • Yi Wang

    (School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yule Liu

    (School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Huawu Wu

    (Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

  • Junwei Ding

    (School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Qian Xiao

    (School of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Wen Chen

    (Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China)

Abstract

Non-point source pollution (NPS) from agriculture is a primary driver of water eutrophication, necessitating effective control for regional water ecological security and sustainable agricultural development. This study focuses on the Chenzhuang village watershed, a typical green agricultural demonstration area in Jiangsu Province, using the HYPE model to analyze hydrological processes and Total Nitrogen (TN) and Total Phosphorus (TP) migration patterns. The model achieved robust performance, with Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) values exceeding 0.7 for daily runoff and 0.35 for monthly TN and TP simulations, ensuring reliable predictions. A multi-scenario simulation framework evaluated the synergistic control effectiveness of Best Management Practices (BMPs), including agricultural production management, nutrient management, and landscape configuration, on TN and TP pollution. The results showed that crop rotation reduced annual average TN and TP concentrations by 11.8% and 13.6%, respectively, by shortening the fallow period. Substituting 50% of chemical fertilizers with organic fertilizers decreased TN by 50.5% (from 1.92 mg/L to 0.95 mg/L) and TP by 68.2% (from 0.22 mg/L to 0.07 mg/L). Converting 3% of farmland to forest enhanced pollutant interception, reducing TN by 4.14% and TP by 2.78%. The integrated BMP scenario (S13), combining these measures, achieved TN and TP concentrations of 0.63 mg/L and 0.046 mg/L, respectively, meeting Class II surface water standards since 2020. Economic analysis revealed an annual net income increase of approximately 15,000 CNY for a 50-acre plot. This was achieved through cost savings, increased crop value, and policy compensation. These findings validate a “source reduction–process interception” approach, providing a scalable management solution for NPS control in small rural watersheds while balancing environmental and economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Yi Wang & Yule Liu & Huawu Wu & Junwei Ding & Qian Xiao & Wen Chen, 2025. "Evaluation of the Synergistic Control Efficiency of Multi-Dimensional Best Management Practices Based on the HYPE Model for Nitrogen and Phosphorus Pollution in Rural Small Watersheds," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2030-:d:1759888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2030/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2030/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2030-:d:1759888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.