IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i19p2008-d1758504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced Spatially Explicit Modeling of Soil Particle Size and Texture Classification Using a Novel Two-Point Machine Learning Hybrid Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Liya Qin

    (Precision Forestry Key Laboratory of Beijing, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Zong Wang

    (Precision Forestry Key Laboratory of Beijing, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
    State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environment Information System, Institute of Geographical Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Xiaoyuan Zhang

    (Business School, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

Accurately predicting soil particle size fractions (PSFs) and classifying soil texture types are essential for soil resource assessment and sustainable land management. PSFs, comprising clay, silt, and sand, form a compositional dataset constrained to sum to 100%. The practical implications of incorporating compositional data characteristics into PSF mapping remain insufficiently explored. This study applies a two-point machine learning (TPML) model, integrating spatial autocorrelation and attribute similarity, to enhance both the quantitative prediction of PSFs and the categorical classification of soil texture types in the Heihe River Basin, China. TPML was compared with random forest regression kriging (RFRK), random forest (RF), XGBoost, and ordinary kriging (OK), and a novel TPML-C model was developed for multi-class classification tasks. Results show that TPML achieved R 2 values of 0.58, 0.55, and 0.64 for clay, silt, and sand, respectively. Among all models, the ALR_TPML predictions showed the most consistent agreement with the observed variability, with predicted ranges of 2.63–98.28% for silt, 0.26–36.16% for clay, and 0.64–96.90% for sand. Across all models, the dominant soil texture types were identified as Sandy Loam (SaLo), Loamy Sand (LoSa), and Silty Loam (SiLo). For soil texture classification, TPML with raw, ALR-, and ILR-transformed data reached right ratios of 61.09%, 55.78%, and 60.00%, correctly identifying 25, 26, and 27 types out of 43. TPML with raw data exhibited strong performance in both regression and classification, with superior ability to separate ambiguous boundaries. Log-ratio transformations, particularly ILR, further improved classification performance by addressing the constraints of compositional data. These findings demonstrate the promise of hybrid machine learning approaches for digital soil mapping and precision agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Liya Qin & Zong Wang & Xiaoyuan Zhang, 2025. "Enhanced Spatially Explicit Modeling of Soil Particle Size and Texture Classification Using a Novel Two-Point Machine Learning Hybrid Framework," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-28, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2008-:d:1758504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2008/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2008/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2008-:d:1758504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.