IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i19p2004-d1758023.html

Enhancing Agroecological Resilience in Arid Regions: A Review of Shelterbelt Structure and Function

Author

Listed:
  • Aishajiang Aili

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Fabiola Bakayisire

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Hailiang Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Abdul Waheed

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

Abstract

Farmland shelterbelts are vital ecological infrastructure for sustaining agriculture in arid regions, where high winds, soil erosion, and water scarcity severely constrain productivity. While their protective functions—reducing wind speed, controlling erosion, moderating microclimates, and enhancing yields—are well documented, previous studies have largely examined individual structural elements in isolation, leaving their interactive effects and trade-offs poorly understood. This review synthesizes current research on the structural optimization of shelterbelts, emphasizing the critical relationship between their physical and biological attributes and their protective functions. Key structural parameters—such as optical porosity, height, width, orientation, and species composition—are examined for their individual and interactive impacts on shelterbelt performance. Empirical and modeling studies indicate that moderate porosity maximizes wind reduction efficiency and extends the leeward protection zone, while multi-row, multi-species configurations effectively suppress soil erosion and improve microclimate conditions. Sheltered areas experience reduced evapotranspiration, increased humidity, and moderated temperatures, collectively enhancing crop water use efficiency and yielding significant improvements in crop production. Advanced methodologies, including field monitoring, wind tunnel testing, computational fluid dynamics, and remote sensing, are employed to quantify benefits and refine designs. A multi-objective optimization framework is essential to balance competing goals: maximizing wind reduction, minimizing water consumption, enhancing biodiversity, and ensuring economic viability. Future challenges involve adapting designs to climate change, integrating water-efficient and native species, leveraging artificial intelligence for predictive modeling, and addressing socio-economic barriers to implementation. Building on this evidence, we propose a multi-objective optimization framework to balance competing goals: maximizing wind protection, minimizing water use, enhancing biodiversity, and ensuring economic viability. We identify key research gaps including unresolved porosity thresholds, the climate resilience of alternative species compositions, and the limited application of optimization algorithms and outline future priorities such as region-specific design guidelines, AI-driven predictive models, and policy incentives. This review offers a novel, trade-off–aware synthesis to guide next-generation shelterbelt design in arid agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Aishajiang Aili & Fabiola Bakayisire & Hailiang Xu & Abdul Waheed, 2025. "Enhancing Agroecological Resilience in Arid Regions: A Review of Shelterbelt Structure and Function," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2004-:d:1758023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas F. Thornton & Claudia Comberti, 2017. "Synergies and trade-offs between adaptation, mitigation and development," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 140(1), pages 5-18, January.
    2. Hayatullah Ahmadzai & Seta Tutundjian & Ismahane Elouafi, 2021. "Policies for Sustainable Agriculture and Livelihood in Marginal Lands: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Stanley, Andrew P.J. & King, Jennifer, 2022. "Optimizing the physical design and layout of a resilient wind, solar, and storage hybrid power plant," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).
    4. Yi, Jun & Li, Huijie & Zhao, Ying & Shao, Ming'an & Zhang, Hailin & Liu, Muxing, 2022. "Assessing soil water balance to optimize irrigation schedules of flood-irrigated maize fields with different cultivation histories in the arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    5. Pushpam Kumar & Uwe A. Schneider, 2008. "Greenhouse gas emission mitigation through agriculture," Working Papers FNU-155, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Feb 2008.
    6. Ali Akbar Firoozi & Farzad Hejazi & Ali Asghar Firoozi, 2024. "Advancing Wind Energy Efficiency: A Systematic Review of Aerodynamic Optimization in Wind Turbine Blade Design," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-30, June.
    7. Cristian Mihai Enescu & Mircea Mihalache & Leonard Ilie & Lucian Dinca & Cristinel Constandache & Gabriel Murariu, 2025. "Agricultural Benefits of Shelterbelts and Windbreaks: A Bibliometric Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-30, May.
    8. Matthew Chidozie Ogwu & Enoch Akwasi Kosoe, 2025. "Integrating Green Infrastructure into Sustainable Agriculture to Enhance Soil Health, Biodiversity, and Microclimate Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-31, April.
    9. Xuelu Cai & Mark Henderson & Ligang Wang & Yuanhang Su & Binhui Liu, 2021. "Shelterbelt Structure and Crop Protection from Increased Typhoon Activity in Northeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, October.
    10. Schneider, Uwe A. & Kumar, Pushpam, 2008. "Greenhouse Gas Mitigation through Agriculture," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 23(01), pages 1-5.
    11. Uwe A. Schneider & Pete Smith, 2008. "Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation and Emission Intensities in Agriculture," Working Papers FNU-164, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Jul 2008.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dumbrell, Nikki P. & Kragt, Marit E. & Gibson, Fiona L., 2016. "What carbon farming activities are farmers likely to adopt? A best–worst scaling survey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 29-37.
    2. Huang, Yong & Elahi, Ehsan & You, Jiansheng & Sheng, Yuhua & Li, Jinwei & Meng, Anchan, 2024. "Land use policy implications of demographic shifts: Analyzing the impact of aging rural populations on agricultural carbon emissions in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Hari Wahyu Wijayanto & Kai-An Lo & Hery Toiba & Moh Shadiqur Rahman, 2022. "Does Agroforestry Adoption Affect Subjective Well-Being? Empirical Evidence from Smallholder Farmers in East Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-10, August.
    4. Zhen, Wei & Qin, Quande & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Spatio-temporal patterns of energy consumption-related GHG emissions in China's crop production systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 274-284.
    5. Lila Singh-Peterson & Fynn De Daunton & Andrew Drysdale & Lorinda Otto & Wim Linström & Ben Lyons, 2025. "Diversifying Rural Economies: Identifying Factors That Discourage Primary Producers from Engaging in Emerging Carbon and Environmental Offsetting Markets in Queensland, Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    6. Huarui Gong & Jing Li & Zhen Liu & Yitao Zhang & Ruixing Hou & Zhu Ouyang, 2022. "Mitigated Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Cropping Systems by Organic Fertilizer and Tillage Management," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Oliver Lazarus & Sonali McDermid & Jennifer Jacquet, 2021. "The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-21, March.
    8. David Bryngelsson & Fredrik Hedenus & Daniel J. A. Johansson & Christian Azar & Stefan Wirsenius, 2017. "How Do Dietary Choices Influence the Energy-System Cost of Stabilizing the Climate?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, February.
    9. Soy-Massoni, Emma & Langemeyer, Johannes & Varga, Diego & Sáez, Marc & Pintó, Josep, 2016. "The importance of ecosystem services in coastal agricultural landscapes: Case study from the Costa Brava, Catalonia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 43-52.
    10. Telmo José Mendes & Diego Silva Siqueira & Eduardo Barretto Figueiredo & Ricardo de Oliveira Bordonal & Mara Regina Moitinho & José Marques Júnior & Newton La Scala Jr., 2021. "Soil carbon stock estimations: methods and a case study of the Maranhão State, Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16410-16427, November.
    11. Ancuta Isbasoiu & Pierre-Alain Jayet & Stéphane De Cara, 2021. "Increasing food production and mitigating agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union: impacts of carbon pricing and calorie production targeting," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(2), pages 409-440, April.
    12. Amanda Silva‐Parra & Juan Manuel Trujillo‐González & Eric C. Brevik, 2021. "Greenhouse gas balance and mitigation potential of agricultural systems in Colombia: A systematic analysis," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 554-572, June.
    13. Chen, Jiandong & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin, 2018. "Changes in energy-related carbon dioxide emissions of the agricultural sector in China from 2005 to 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 748-761.
    14. Wang, Guangshuai & Liang, Yueping & Zhang, Qian & Jha, Shiva K. & Gao, Yang & Shen, Xiaojun & Sun, Jingsheng & Duan, Aiwang, 2016. "Mitigated CH4 and N2O emissions and improved irrigation water use efficiency in winter wheat field with surface drip irrigation in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 403-407.
    15. Saw Min & Martin Rulík, 2020. "Comparison of Carbon Dioxide (CO 2 ) Fluxes between Conventional and Conserved Irrigated Rice Paddy Fields in Myanmar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    16. Connor, Melanie & de Guia, Annalyn H. & Quilloy, Reianne & Van Nguyen, Hung & Gummert, Martin & Sander, Bjoern Ole, 2020. "When climate change is not psychologically distant – Factors influencing the acceptance of sustainable farming practices in the Mekong river Delta of Vietnam," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    17. Franco-Luesma, Samuel & Álvaro-Fuentes, Jorge & Plaza-Bonilla, Daniel & Arrúe, José Luis & Cantero-Martínez, Carlos & Cavero, José, 2019. "Influence of irrigation time and frequency on greenhouse gas emissions in a solid-set sprinkler-irrigated maize under Mediterranean conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 303-311.
    18. Anna Kocira & Mariola Staniak & Marzena Tomaszewska & Rafał Kornas & Jacek Cymerman & Katarzyna Panasiewicz & Halina Lipińska, 2020. "Legume Cover Crops as One of the Elements of Strategic Weed Management and Soil Quality Improvement. A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-41, September.
    19. Kerstin Jantke & Martina J. Hartmann & Livia Rasche & Benjamin Blanz & Uwe A. Schneider, 2020. "Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Knowledge and Positions of German Farmers," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-13, April.
    20. Song, Guobao & Song, Jie & Zhang, Shushen, 2016. "Modelling the policies of optimal straw use for maximum mitigation of climate change in China from a system perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 789-810.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2004-:d:1758023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.