IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i19p2004-d1758023.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Agroecological Resilience in Arid Regions: A Review of Shelterbelt Structure and Function

Author

Listed:
  • Aishajiang Aili

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Fabiola Bakayisire

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Hailiang Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

  • Abdul Waheed

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China)

Abstract

Farmland shelterbelts are vital ecological infrastructure for sustaining agriculture in arid regions, where high winds, soil erosion, and water scarcity severely constrain productivity. While their protective functions—reducing wind speed, controlling erosion, moderating microclimates, and enhancing yields—are well documented, previous studies have largely examined individual structural elements in isolation, leaving their interactive effects and trade-offs poorly understood. This review synthesizes current research on the structural optimization of shelterbelts, emphasizing the critical relationship between their physical and biological attributes and their protective functions. Key structural parameters—such as optical porosity, height, width, orientation, and species composition—are examined for their individual and interactive impacts on shelterbelt performance. Empirical and modeling studies indicate that moderate porosity maximizes wind reduction efficiency and extends the leeward protection zone, while multi-row, multi-species configurations effectively suppress soil erosion and improve microclimate conditions. Sheltered areas experience reduced evapotranspiration, increased humidity, and moderated temperatures, collectively enhancing crop water use efficiency and yielding significant improvements in crop production. Advanced methodologies, including field monitoring, wind tunnel testing, computational fluid dynamics, and remote sensing, are employed to quantify benefits and refine designs. A multi-objective optimization framework is essential to balance competing goals: maximizing wind reduction, minimizing water consumption, enhancing biodiversity, and ensuring economic viability. Future challenges involve adapting designs to climate change, integrating water-efficient and native species, leveraging artificial intelligence for predictive modeling, and addressing socio-economic barriers to implementation. Building on this evidence, we propose a multi-objective optimization framework to balance competing goals: maximizing wind protection, minimizing water use, enhancing biodiversity, and ensuring economic viability. We identify key research gaps including unresolved porosity thresholds, the climate resilience of alternative species compositions, and the limited application of optimization algorithms and outline future priorities such as region-specific design guidelines, AI-driven predictive models, and policy incentives. This review offers a novel, trade-off–aware synthesis to guide next-generation shelterbelt design in arid agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Aishajiang Aili & Fabiola Bakayisire & Hailiang Xu & Abdul Waheed, 2025. "Enhancing Agroecological Resilience in Arid Regions: A Review of Shelterbelt Structure and Function," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2004-:d:1758023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2004/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/19/2004/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:19:p:2004-:d:1758023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.