IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i18p1945-d1749340.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Multi-Scale Comprehensive Evaluation for Nine Evapotranspiration Products Across Mainland China Under Extreme Climatic Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Long Qian

    (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Xinjiang Research Institute of Arid Region Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Lifeng Wu

    (School of Soil and Water Conversation, Jiangxi University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Nanchang 330099, China
    Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Ning Dong

    (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Tianjin Dai

    (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Xingjiao Yu

    (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Xuqian Bai

    (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Qiliang Yang

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Xiaogang Liu

    (Faculty of Modern Agricultural Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650500, China)

  • Junying Chen

    (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Xinjiang Research Institute of Arid Region Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Zhitao Zhang

    (College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas, Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
    Xinjiang Research Institute of Arid Region Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

Abstract

Accurate quantification of evapotranspiration (ET) is crucial for agricultural water management and climate change adaptation, especially in global warming and extreme climate events. Despite the availability of various ET products, their applicability across different scales and climatic conditions has not been comprehensively verified. This study evaluates nine ET products at grid, basin, and site scales in China from 2003 to 2014 under varying climatic conditions, including extreme temperatures, vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and drought. The main results are as follows: (1) At the grid scale, all products except the MODIS/Terra Net Evapotranspiration 8-Day L4 Global 500m SIN Grid (MOD16A2) product showed high consistency, with the Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model V4.2a (GLEAM) product exhibiting the highest comparability. The three-cornered hat (TCH) method revealed that GLEAM and the Synthesized Global Actual Evapotranspiration Dataset (Syn) had low uncertainties in multiple basins, while the Reliability Ensemble Averaging (REA) product and Penman–Monteith–Leuning Evapotranspiration V2 (PMLv2) product had the smallest uncertainties in the Songhua River and Hai River Basins. (2) At the basin scale, ET products were closely aligned with water-balance-based ET (WB-ET), with GLEAM achieving the smallest root mean square error (RMSE) (22.94 mm/month). (3) At the site scale, accuracy decreased significantly under extreme climatic conditions, with the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) dropping from about 0.60 to below 0.30 and the mean absolute error (MAE) increasing by 110.30% (extreme high temperatures) and 101.40% (extreme high VPD). Drought conditions caused slight instability in ET estimations, with MAE increasing by approximately 12.00–40.00%. (4) Finally, using a small number of daily ET products as inputs for machine learning models, such as random forest (RF), greatly improved ET estimation, with R 2 reaching 0.91 overall and 0.81 under extreme conditions. GLEAM was the most important product for RF in ET estimation. This study provides essential guidance for selecting and improving ET products to enhance agricultural water-use efficiency and sustainable irrigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Long Qian & Lifeng Wu & Ning Dong & Tianjin Dai & Xingjiao Yu & Xuqian Bai & Qiliang Yang & Xiaogang Liu & Junying Chen & Zhitao Zhang, 2025. "A Multi-Scale Comprehensive Evaluation for Nine Evapotranspiration Products Across Mainland China Under Extreme Climatic Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-30, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:18:p:1945-:d:1749340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/18/1945/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/18/1945/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:18:p:1945-:d:1749340. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.