IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i18p1930-d1747474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating the Tree Canopy Acceleration Required for Optimal Mechanical Harvesting Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Naji Mordi Naji Al-Dosary

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Thomas Francis Burks

    (Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, P.O. Box 110570, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)

  • Saad Abdulrahman Al-Hamed

    (Department of Agricultural Engineering, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Mechanical harvesting of ripe fruit should significantly increase fruit picking productivity and reduce harvesting times and operating costs. This study presents the optimal average gravitational acceleration of grapefruit tree branches obtained with a self-propelled citrus canopy shaker that varied the number, vibrational speed, and canopy penetration depth of the beating arms. Accelerometer sensors measured vibration and acceleration, and the fast Fourier transform (FFT) algorithm analyzed the vibration data. The acceleration values reflected the behavior of the tree branches in response to harvester shaking and varied with different harvester configurations and accelerometer placements in the tree canopy. The magnitude of the gravitational acceleration (g) increased significantly by increasing the number of shaking beaters, the shaker’s penetration into the tree canopy, and increasing the harvester’s shaking speed. The initial 14 beaters only provided acceleration values of 8.00 g maximum, 1.93 g minimum, and 5.044 g averages. Using 26 beaters yielded a maximum of 14.09 g, a minimum of 6.27 g, and an average of 8.65 g. Increasing the shaking speed also increased the forces applied to the tree canopy. An average of 7.387 g, achieved at 45.3 in/s, increased to 8.004 g at 65.9 in/s. Higher (g) values resulted in increased grapefruit fruit dislodgement, with 100% fruit removal on some trees.

Suggested Citation

  • Naji Mordi Naji Al-Dosary & Thomas Francis Burks & Saad Abdulrahman Al-Hamed, 2025. "Estimating the Tree Canopy Acceleration Required for Optimal Mechanical Harvesting Performance," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-27, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:18:p:1930-:d:1747474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/18/1930/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/18/1930/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coral Ortiz & Antonio Torregrosa & Sergio Castro-García, 2021. "Comparison of a Lightweight Experimental Shaker and an Orchard Tractor Mounted Trunk Shaker for Fresh Market Citrus Harvesting," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Yun Liang & Weipeng Jiang & Yunfan Liu & Zihao Wu & Run Zheng, 2025. "Picking-Point Localization Algorithm for Citrus Fruits Based on Improved YOLOv8 Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing Chen & Weizu Wang & Chaowei Huang & Yanfei Wang & Han Fu & Jun Li, 2023. "Study of the Group Vibrational Detachment Characteristics of Litchi ( Litchi chinensis Sonn) Clusters," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Delin Wu & Enlong Zhao & Dong Fang & Shan Jiang & Cheng Wu & Weiwei Wang & Rongyan Wang, 2022. "Determination of Vibration Picking Parameters of Camellia oleifera Fruit Based on Acceleration and Strain Response of Branches," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:18:p:1930-:d:1747474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.