IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i18p1923-d1746930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing Controlled-Release Urea and Conventional Urea Ratios Enhances Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield in Peanut

Author

Listed:
  • Mingxuan Gu

    (College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.)

  • Lu Luo

    (College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work and should be considered co-first authors.)

  • Ruiyuan Fang

    (Linyi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Linyi 276000, China)

  • Fengzhen Liu

    (College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Zhen Tan

    (College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Zheng Wu

    (College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Mengjian Zheng

    (College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Kun Zhang

    (College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China)

  • Yongshan Wan

    (College of Agronomy, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271018, China
    Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology, and Cultivation, Ministry of Agriculture, Taian 271018, China)

Abstract

Combined application of controlled-release urea (CRU) and urea (U) improves yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in various crops, but the optimal blending ratio and related mechanisms in peanut production, particularly regarding antioxidant enzyme responses, remain insufficiently studied. To address this, a two-year field experiment was conducted with six fertilization treatments at a nitrogen rate of 120 kg·ha −1 : CK (no nitrogen), T1 (100% U), T2 (100% CRU), T3 (50% CRU + 50% U), T4 (70% CRU + 30% U), and T5 (30% CRU + 70% U). The results showed that compared with T1, the blended treatments significantly increased yield by 5.41–10.88% and improved NUE by 35.90–64.37%, with T4 performing the best. The T4 treatment significantly enhanced photosynthetic characteristics, promoted dry matter accumulation, coordinated nitrogen supply across growth stages, strengthened nitrogen metabolism enzyme activity, and delayed leaf senescence. At harvesting stage, the activities of SOD, POD, and CAT in T4 were 12.82%, 22.37%, and 23.32% higher, respectively, than those in T1, while MDA content decreased by 11.29%. This study demonstrates that in the ridge-furrow plastic film mulching cultivation system of Shandong’s brown soil, coapplying 70% CRU with 30% U is an effective nitrogen management strategy for peanuts. This approach achieves high and stable yields by improving nitrogen metabolism and antioxidant capacity. The findings provide a theoretical basis and technical reference for sustainable intensification of peanut production in similar ecological regions and cultivation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingxuan Gu & Lu Luo & Ruiyuan Fang & Fengzhen Liu & Zhen Tan & Zheng Wu & Mengjian Zheng & Kun Zhang & Yongshan Wan, 2025. "Optimizing Controlled-Release Urea and Conventional Urea Ratios Enhances Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield in Peanut," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:18:p:1923-:d:1746930
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/18/1923/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/18/1923/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:18:p:1923-:d:1746930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.