IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i17p1863-d1738745.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Tannin-Rich Supplements on Immune Response in Goats and Beef Cattle: A Collection of Controlled Feeding Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian P. Schreiber

    (Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, USA
    This paper is a part of the Master’s Theses of Sebastian P. Schreiber and Rebecca D. Burson presented at Angelo State University.)

  • Rebecca D. Burson

    (Department of Agriculture, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX 76904, USA
    This paper is a part of the Master’s Theses of Sebastian P. Schreiber and Rebecca D. Burson presented at Angelo State University.)

  • Cody B. Scott

    (Department of Agriculture, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX 76904, USA)

  • Corey J. Owens

    (Department of Agriculture, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX 76904, USA)

Abstract

Emerging research evokes selection for various plant secondary compounds as a potential driver of ruminant diet selection, through animals’ evident ability to rectify deficiencies and even self-medicate. This idea was assessed by comparing physiological responses to vaccination challenges of animals fed diets of differing phytochemical composition. In the first of three separate trials, goats were placed in individual pens and fed one of three treatments in a completely randomized design. Treatments in Trial 1 consisted of redberry juniper (50 g) and shin oak (50 g). In Trial 2, goats were fed rations containing grape and blueberry pomace at an inclusion rate of 20%. In Trial 3, black Angus heifers were fed rations containing grape and blueberry pomace at an as-fed inclusion rate of 6%. Average daily gain, intake, and blood chemistry were assessed following vaccination health challenges. In Trial 1, goats fed shin oak had higher ( p < 0.05) blood globulins. Trial 2 revealed no treatment group differences in average daily gain (ADG), intake, or blood parameters evaluated. In Trial 3, no difference occurred in blood parameters; however, intake following inoculation was significantly greater ( p < 0.05) for heifers with grape/blueberry pomace included in their rations. In conclusion, phytochemicals, specifically condensed tannins, may have the ability to enhance immune response in ruminants, but further research is required, and these effects likely depend upon the source, structure, and dose of tannins or parent plant materials offered.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian P. Schreiber & Rebecca D. Burson & Cody B. Scott & Corey J. Owens, 2025. "Effects of Tannin-Rich Supplements on Immune Response in Goats and Beef Cattle: A Collection of Controlled Feeding Trials," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:17:p:1863-:d:1738745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/17/1863/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/17/1863/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan Pelegrin-Valls & Javier Álvarez-Rodríguez & María José Martín-Alonso & Gustavo Adolfo Ramírez & Claudia Baila & Sandra Lobon & Margalida Joy & Beatriz Serrano-Pérez, 2022. "Effect of Maternal Dietary Condensed Tannins from Sainfoin ( Onobrychis viciifolia ) on Gut Health and Antioxidant-Immune Crosstalk in Suckling Lambs," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;
      ;

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:17:p:1863-:d:1738745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.