Author
Listed:
- Irena Bertoncelj
(Department of Agricultural Ecology and Natural Resources, Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova ulica 17, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)
- Anže Rovanšek
(Department of Agricultural Ecology and Natural Resources, Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova ulica 17, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)
- Robert Leskovšek
(Department of Agricultural Ecology and Natural Resources, Agricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova ulica 17, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)
Abstract
Tillage is a major factor influencing soil biological communities, particularly earthworms, which play a key role in soil structure and nutrient cycling. To address soil degradation, less-intensive tillage practices are increasingly being adopted globally and have shown positive effects on earthworm populations when applied consistently over extended periods. However, understanding of the earthworm population dynamics in the period following the implementation of changes in tillage practices remains limited. This three-year field study (2021–2023) investigates earthworm populations during the early transition phase (4–6 years) following the conversion from conventional ploughing to conservation (<8 cm depth, with residue retention) and no-tillage systems in a temperate arable system in central Slovenia. Earthworms were sampled annually in early October from three adjacent fields, each following the same three-year crop rotation (maize—winter cereal + cover crop—soybeans), using a combination of hand-sorting and allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) extraction. Results showed that reduced tillage practices significantly increased both earthworm biomass and abundance compared to conventional ploughing. However, a significant interaction between tillage and year was observed, with a sharp decline in earthworm abundance and mass in 2022, likely driven by a combination of 2022 summer tillage prior to cover crop sowing and extreme drought conditions. Juvenile earthworms were especially affected, with their proportion decreasing from 62% to 34% in ploughed plots and from 63% to 26% in conservation tillage plots. Despite interannual fluctuations, no-till showed the lowest variability in earthworm population. Long-term monitoring is essential to disentangle management and environmental effects and to inform resilient soil management strategies.
Suggested Citation
Irena Bertoncelj & Anže Rovanšek & Robert Leskovšek, 2025.
"Positive Effects of Reduced Tillage Practices on Earthworm Population Detected in the Early Transition Period,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:15:p:1658-:d:1715078
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Jin Zhang & Lan-Fang Wu, 2021.
"Impact of Tillage and Crop Residue Management on the Weed Community and Wheat Yield in a Wheat–Maize Double Cropping System,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, March.
- Vytautas Seibutis & Kęstutis Tamošiūnas & Irena Deveikytė & Gražina Kadžienė & Roma Semaškienė, 2025.
"Earthworm Population Response to Simplified Tillage and Shortened Crop Rotations in a Central Lithuanian Cambisol: A Five-Year Study,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
- Nazeer Ahmed & Khalid Awadh Al-Mutairi, 2022.
"Earthworms Effect on Microbial Population and Soil Fertility as Well as Their Interaction with Agriculture Practices,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, June.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:15:p:1658-:d:1715078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.