Author
Listed:
- Kyle J. McLean
(Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)
- Kiernan J. Brandt
(Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)
- Taylor B. Ault-Seay
(Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)
- Rebecca R. Payton
(Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)
- Liesel G. Schneider
(Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)
- J. Lannett Edwards
(Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)
- Phillip R. Myer
(Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)
- Justin D. Rhinehart
(Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA)
Abstract
Reproductive efficiency is largely impacted during heifer development, which generally requires nutrient supplementation for proper maturation. Nutritional status can also influence inflammation within the reproductive tract. Therefore, we hypothesized that cytokine concentrations in uterine luminal fluid (ULF) will be impacted by protein supplementation following exposure to semen via artificial insemination (AI). Commercial heifers ( n = 60) were utilized to determine the effects of protein supplementation and AI on cytokine concentrations in ULF. Heifers were randomly assigned to one of three crude protein (CP) treatments (11%, 15%, and 19% overall CP) via supplementation: (1) CON (10% CP), (2) P20 (20% CP), and (3) P40 (40% CP). All heifers underwent estrus synchronization and ULF was collected 14 d after insemination. Cytokine profiles were constructed in MetaboAnalyst 5.0, and R Studio was used for individual cytokine analyses. Control heifers had increased ( p = 0.05) MIP-1β concentrations (148.7 ± 123.9 pg) over P20 heifers (42.3 ± 123.9 pg), and P40 heifers (75.5 ± 123.9 pg) had intermediate concentrations. Semen exposure (1877 ± 550 pg) showed a trend ( p = 0.06) to increase concentrations of IP-10 compared with heifers who were not inseminated (1556 ± 550 pg). In conclusion, although protein supplementation and semen exposure had minimal effects on overall cytokine profiles, MIP-1β, IP-10, and MIP-1α were identified as potential key regulators of uterine inflammation during early gestation.
Suggested Citation
Kyle J. McLean & Kiernan J. Brandt & Taylor B. Ault-Seay & Rebecca R. Payton & Liesel G. Schneider & J. Lannett Edwards & Phillip R. Myer & Justin D. Rhinehart, 2025.
"The Impacts of Protein Supplementation and Semen Exposure on Uterine Cytokines in Beef Heifers,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-10, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:15:p:1642-:d:1713136
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:15:p:1642-:d:1713136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.