Author
Listed:
- Mollie M. Green
(Department of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)
- Hunter R. Ford
(Department of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)
- Alexandra P. Tegeler
(Department of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)
- Oscar J. Benitez
(Department of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
School of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA)
- Bradley J. Johnson
(Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA)
- Clarissa Strieder-Barboza
(Department of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
School of Veterinary Medicine, Texas Tech University, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA)
Abstract
Deposition of intramuscular fat (IM), also known as marbling, is the deciding factor of beef quality grade in the U.S. Defining molecular mechanisms underlying the differential deposition of adipose tissue in distinct anatomical areas in beef cattle is key to the development of strategies for marbling enhancement while limiting the accumulation of excessive subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). The objective of this exploratory study was to define the IM and SAT transcriptional heterogeneity at the whole tissue and single-nuclei levels in beef steers. Longissimus dorsi muscle samples (9–11th rib) were collected from two finished beef steers at harvest to dissect matched IM and adjacent SAT (backfat). Total RNA from IM and SAT was isolated and sequenced in an Illumina NovaSeq 6000. Nuclei from the same samples were isolated by dounce homogenization, libraries generated with 10× Genomics, and sequenced in an Illumina NovaSeq 6000, followed by analysis via Cell Ranger pipeline and Seurat in RStudio (v4.3.2) By the expression of signature marker genes, single-nuclei RNA sequencing (snRNAseq) analysis identified mature adipocytes (AD; ADIPOQ , LEP ), adipose stromal and progenitor cells (ASPC; PDGFRA ), endothelial cells (EC; VWF , PECAM1 ), smooth muscle cells (SMC; NOTCH3 , MYL9 ) and immune cells (IMC; CD163 , MRC1 ). We detected six cell clusters in SAT and nine in IM. Across IM and SAT, AD was the most abundant cell type, followed by ASPC, SMC, and IMC. In SAT, AD made up 50% of the cellular population, followed by ASPC (31%), EC (14%), IMC (1%), and SMC (4%). In IM depot, AD made up 23% of the cellular population, followed by ASPC at 19% of the population, EC at 28%, IMC at 7% and SMC at 12%. The abundance of ASPC and AD was lower in IM vs. SAT, while IMC was increased, suggesting a potential involvement of immune cells on IM deposition. Accordingly, both bulk RNAseq and snRNAseq analyses identified activated pathways of inflammation and metabolic function in IM. These results demonstrate distinct transcriptional cellular heterogeneity between SAT and IM depots in beef steers, which may underly the mechanisms by which fat deposits in each depot. The identification of depot-specific cell populations in IM and SAT via snRNAseq analysis has the potential to reveal target genes for the modulation of fat deposition in beef cattle.
Suggested Citation
Mollie M. Green & Hunter R. Ford & Alexandra P. Tegeler & Oscar J. Benitez & Bradley J. Johnson & Clarissa Strieder-Barboza, 2025.
"A Single-Cell Assessment of Intramuscular and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue in Beef Cattle,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-16, July.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:14:p:1545-:d:1704529
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:14:p:1545-:d:1704529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.