Author
Listed:
- Dae Yeong Kang
(Department of Smart Farm, Gyeongsang National University (Institute of Smart Space Agriculture (ISSA)), Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Byeong Eun Moon
(Department of Convergence Biosystems Engineering, Suncheon National University, Suncheon 57922, Republic of Korea
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Myeong Yong Kang
(Department of Smart Farm, Gyeongsang National University (Institute of Smart Space Agriculture (ISSA)), Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea)
- Jung Hoo Kook
(Department of Smart Farm, Gyeongsang National University (Institute of Smart Space Agriculture (ISSA)), Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea)
- Nibas Chandra Deb
(Department of Bio-Systems Engineering, Gyeongsang National University (Institute of Smart Space Agriculture (ISSA)), Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea)
- Niraj Tamrakar
(Department of Bio-Systems Engineering, Gyeongsang National University (Institute of Smart Space Agriculture (ISSA)), Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea)
- Elanchezhian Arulmozhi
(Department of Bio-Systems Engineering, Gyeongsang National University (Institute of Smart Space Agriculture (ISSA)), Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea)
- Hyeon Tae Kim
(Department of Bio-Industrial Machinery Engineering, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
Pork accounts for 34% of global meat consumption, following poultry and beef. Intensive pig farming has expanded to meet increasing demand, but space constraints and poor environmental conditions can negatively affect pig welfare. This study aimed to investigate pigs’ spatial preferences in response to environmental factors in an experimental pig barn. Six 60-day-old Yorkshire pigs were observed for 60 days. Indoor temperature (IT), relative humidity (IRH), and CO 2 concentration (ICO 2 ) were measured hourly, and pig positions were recorded using an RGB 2D-IP camera. Pearson correlation analysis was performed using SPSS. IT ranged from 14.3 °C to 25.1 °C, IRH from 78.9% to 96.5%, and ICO 2 from 1038 to 1850 ppm. A strong negative correlation was found between IT and IRH (r = −0.89), while IT and ICO 2 were uncorrelated (r = −0.01). Pigs showed a clear preference for sections with lower IT, supporting previous findings on thermal preference. Structural features, such as two-wall enclosures, also influenced stay frequency. These results suggest that optimizing barn structure and improving ventilation and manure management can support thermal comfort and improve welfare in intensive pig farming systems.
Suggested Citation
Dae Yeong Kang & Byeong Eun Moon & Myeong Yong Kang & Jung Hoo Kook & Nibas Chandra Deb & Niraj Tamrakar & Elanchezhian Arulmozhi & Hyeon Tae Kim, 2025.
"Analysis of Pig Tendencies to Stay Specific Sections Within the Pig Barn According to Environmental Parameters and Facilities Features,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:1282-:d:1678828
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:12:p:1282-:d:1678828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.