Author
Listed:
- Bing Ma
(Co-Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
Jiangsu Provincial Environmental Geological Survey Brigade, Nanjing 210012, China)
- Haibo Hu
(Co-Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)
- Xingyu Liu
(Co-Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)
- Qi Wang
(Jiangsu Provincial Environmental Geological Survey Brigade, Nanjing 210012, China)
- Hongwei Zhou
(Jiangsu Provincial Environmental Geological Survey Brigade, Nanjing 210012, China)
- Sheng Chen
(Jiangsu Provincial Environmental Geological Survey Brigade, Nanjing 210012, China)
- Jiacai Liu
(Jiangsu Provincial Environmental Geological Survey Brigade, Nanjing 210012, China)
- Yuyan Li
(Donghai County Forest Resources Management and Protection Station, Lianyungang 222300, China)
Abstract
Drought stress is a crucial factor limiting plant survival and growth, especially during the seedling establishment stage. A deep understanding of different plants’ responses to drought stress and their drought resistance is of great significance for vegetation restoration under drought conditions. This study selected one-year-old seedlings of Winter Jasmine ( Jasminum nudiflorum ), Oleander ( Nerium oleander ), Privet ( Ligustrum lucidum ), and Redleaf Photinia ( Photinia × fraseri ) as research objects. Through pot experiments, we investigated the physiological and biochemical responses of these shrubs under different levels of drought stress (control, mild, moderate, and severe drought stress, corresponding to 75%, 60%, 45%, and 30% of field maximum water holding capacity) to comprehensively assess their drought resistance capabilities. The research results indicated that as the level of drought stress increased, significant changes ( p < 0.05) occurred in the physiological and biochemical indicators of all four plant species. The chlorophyll content (Chla+b) of Winter Jasmine and Redleaf Photinia gradually decreased with the intensification of stress, while the Chla+b of Oleander showed the most significant decline under moderate stress and Privet was most affected under mild stress. The proline (Pro) and soluble sugar (SS) contents of all four plants exhibited an upward trend, suggesting that the plants coped with drought stress by accumulating these osmoregulatory substances. Drought stress led to damage to plant cell membranes, manifested by an increase in malondialdehyde content (MDA), with Winter Jasmine showing the most pronounced increase. The activities of peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in the four plant species responded differently to drought stress: the POD activity of Oleander and Redleaf Photinia increased with the deepening of stress, while that of Winter Jasmine and Privet decreased. A comprehensive evaluation of the drought tolerance of the four plant species was performed using principal component analysis and affiliation function value methods. The drought tolerance of the four shrubs, from strongest to weakest, was as follows: Redleaf Photinia > Oleander > Privet > Winter Jasmine. This finding provides valuable insights for plant selection in ecological slope protection projects, and Redleaf Photinia and Oleander can be promoted for use in vegetation restoration work under drought conditions.
Suggested Citation
Bing Ma & Haibo Hu & Xingyu Liu & Qi Wang & Hongwei Zhou & Sheng Chen & Jiacai Liu & Yuyan Li, 2025.
"Response of Four Shrubs to Drought Stress and Comprehensive Evaluation of Their Drought Resistance,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1211-:d:1669903
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:11:p:1211-:d:1669903. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.