Author
Listed:
- Donghai Liu
(Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Agricultural Experimental Hongshan Station for Soil Quality, Wuhan 430064, China)
- Zhuoxi Xiao
(Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Agricultural Experimental Hongshan Station for Soil Quality, Wuhan 430064, China)
- Zhi Zhang
(Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Agricultural Experimental Hongshan Station for Soil Quality, Wuhan 430064, China)
- Yan Qiao
(Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Agricultural Experimental Hongshan Station for Soil Quality, Wuhan 430064, China)
- Yunfeng Chen
(Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Agricultural Experimental Hongshan Station for Soil Quality, Wuhan 430064, China)
- Haicheng Wu
(Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Agricultural Experimental Hongshan Station for Soil Quality, Wuhan 430064, China)
- Cheng Hu
(Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Agricultural Experimental Hongshan Station for Soil Quality, Wuhan 430064, China)
Abstract
Little is known about the effect of the long-term application of organic and inorganic fertilizers on P-use efficiency, P budget, and the residual effect of P fertilizer. To clarify the effect of different fertilization on soil P balance in a rice ( Oryza sativa L.)–wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) rotation system is helpful to promote the sustainable development of agriculture. Thus, a thirty-five-year fertilizer experiment was conducted with eight treatments, including an unfertilized control (CK); chemical nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) fertilizers; and organic manure (M) either alone or in combination treatments (N, NP, NPK, M, MN, MNP, and MNPK). The results indicated that crop yields and P uptake were higher in the combined application of manure and chemical fertilizer treatments than in the manure or chemical fertilizer alone treatments. Soil P budget indicated a 23.4–55.4 kg P ha −1 yr −1 surplus in the organic combined with or without mineral fertilizer treatments, but the soil P budget indicated a 20.0 and 21.9 kg P ha −1 yr −1 deficit in the control and N treatments. The proportion of residual fertilizer P converted to soil available P in NP, NPK, M, MN, MNP, and MNPK treatments was 4.5%, 4.8%, 19.1%, 19.0%, 11.5%, and 13.3%, respectively, over a 35-year period. Furthermore, according to the higher P content and crop uptake in organic manure treatment compared with chemical P fertilizer alone, an organic addition could effectively reduce the use of chemical fertilizer and become an effective way of sustainable development in practice. Therefore, the combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizer will be a practical method to increase crop yields and soil P status in a rice–wheat planting system.
Suggested Citation
Donghai Liu & Zhuoxi Xiao & Zhi Zhang & Yan Qiao & Yunfeng Chen & Haicheng Wu & Cheng Hu, 2024.
"The Crop Phosphorus Uptake, Use Efficiency, and Budget under Long-Term Manure and Fertilizer Application in a Rice–Wheat Planting System,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1393-:d:1458651
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:8:p:1393-:d:1458651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.