IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i2p226-d1329789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Different Planting Years on Soil Physicochemical Indexes, Microbial Functional Diversity and Fruit Quality of Pear Trees

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaomin Pang

    (Center for Information Technology and Laboratory Management, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China)

  • Meihui Chen

    (College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China
    College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Pengyao Miao

    (College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China
    College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Weiting Cheng

    (College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China
    College of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Zewei Zhou

    (College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China
    College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)

  • Ying Zhang

    (College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China)

  • Qi Zhang

    (College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China)

  • Jianghua Ye

    (College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China)

  • Xiaoli Jia

    (College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China)

  • Haibin Wang

    (College of Tea and Food Science, Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China)

Abstract

This study explores the interaction between pear fruit quality and the soil environment over four different planting years (5, 20, 30, and 40 years), focusing on the fruit’s chemical properties, rhizosphere soil properties, microbial communities, and both microbiomass and functional diversity. The results found that reducing sugar, sucrose, and vitamin C contents in pears initially increased with planting years before declining, while total acidity showed an inverse trend. Analysis of the soil physicochemical index revealed that rhizosphere soil physicochemical indexes were significantly different between different planting years, but there was no obvious regularity. Correlation analysis found that total phosphorus, total potassium, organic matter, and available nitrogen were significantly and positively correlated with pear quality indexes. Soil microbiomass carbon decreased before increasing with increasing planting year, while soil microbial nitrogen was irregular. Results of functional diversity of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities showed that the relationship of carbon source utilization among the six groups was 20 years > 5 years > 30 years > 40 years. Interestingly, the 20-year group had the most core differences in microbial communities. The study suggests that as pear trees age, adequate plant nutrition during peak fruiting periods can improve soil fertility, microbial functional diversity, and ultimately enhance fruit quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaomin Pang & Meihui Chen & Pengyao Miao & Weiting Cheng & Zewei Zhou & Ying Zhang & Qi Zhang & Jianghua Ye & Xiaoli Jia & Haibin Wang, 2024. "Effects of Different Planting Years on Soil Physicochemical Indexes, Microbial Functional Diversity and Fruit Quality of Pear Trees," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:226-:d:1329789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/2/226/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/2/226/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:226-:d:1329789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.