IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i1p117-d1318307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigation of Collision Damage Mechanisms and Reduction Methods for Pod Pepper

Author

Listed:
  • Gaoliang Wang

    (School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Binghua He

    (Changyi Modern Agriculture Development Center, Changyi 261502, China)

  • Dianlei Han

    (School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • He Zhang

    (School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Xinzhong Wang

    (School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Yongcheng Chen

    (School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Xuegeng Chen

    (School of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Rongqiang Zhao

    (School of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China
    Jiangsu Province and Education Ministry Co-sponsored Synergistic Innovation Center of Modern Agricultural Equipment, Zhenjiang 212013, China)

  • Guoyu Li

    (School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

This study aims to address the current situation of the late start of mechanized harvesting technology for the pod pepper, the high damage rate of existing pod pepper harvesters, and the lack of theoretical support for key harvesting components. The Hertz theory is employed to investigate the damage mechanism of collisions between pod pepper and comb fingers. The study analyzes the maximum deformation of pod pepper and the critical speed at which damage occurs during the collision process. Furthermore, it explores the critical relative speed that leads to damage in pod pepper. Orthogonal tests are conducted to analyze the effects of rotational speed, hose thickness, and moisture content on the efficiency of pod pepper picking. The experimental results are then subjected to multifactorial ANOVA to identify the optimal test parameters. The structural and motion parameters of the picking device are optimized based on these conditions. It is determined that the critical relative velocity for damage to pod pepper during a collision with the comb finger is V 0 = 11.487 m s −1 . The collision velocities of pod pepper with different hose thicknesses are analyzed using the i-SPEED TR endoscopic high-speed dynamic analysis system to obtain the corresponding collision velocities for different hose thicknesses. The study finds that rotational speed, hose thickness, and the water content of pod pepper affect the damage rate and stem shedding rate. The optimal experimental parameters are determined to be a rotational speed of 705.04 rpm, hose thickness of 3 mm, and water content of the pepper of 71.27%.

Suggested Citation

  • Gaoliang Wang & Binghua He & Dianlei Han & He Zhang & Xinzhong Wang & Yongcheng Chen & Xuegeng Chen & Rongqiang Zhao & Guoyu Li, 2024. "Investigation of Collision Damage Mechanisms and Reduction Methods for Pod Pepper," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:117-:d:1318307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/1/117/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/1/117/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:1:p:117-:d:1318307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.