IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i12p2275-d1541649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Biological Additives on the Fermentation Quality and Microbial Community of High-Moisture Oat Silage

Author

Listed:
  • Yifei Huang

    (Engineering Research Center of Bio-Process of Ministry of Education, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Siling Zhang

    (Engineering Research Center of Bio-Process of Ministry of Education, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Maoling Hu

    (Engineering Research Center of Bio-Process of Ministry of Education, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Shuyuan Yang

    (Engineering Research Center of Bio-Process of Ministry of Education, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Ailing Hui

    (Engineering Research Center of Bio-Process of Ministry of Education, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Wencheng Zhang

    (Engineering Research Center of Bio-Process of Ministry of Education, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Zeyu Wu

    (Engineering Research Center of Bio-Process of Ministry of Education, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to explore the effects of biological additives, including Streptococcus bovis (SB), Bacillus subtilis (BS), xylanase (XT), and their combined treatments, including SB + BS (SBBS), SB + XT (SBXT), and BS + XT (BSXT), on the chemical composition, fermentation characteristics, and microbial community of high-moisture oat silage. Compared with the CK group (control group without additives), SB and SBBS treatments increased the lactic acid content ( p < 0.05) and reduced the contents of acetic acid, propionic acid, butyric acid, and ammonia nitrogen in silage ( p < 0.05). XT, SBXT, and BSXT treatments decreased the neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber contents ( p < 0.05), increasing the water-soluble carbohydrate content ( p < 0.05). The SB, SBBS, and SBXT treatments increased the abundance of Lactiplantibacillus ( p < 0.05) and significantly decreased microbial richness with diversity ( p < 0.05), improving the microbial community structure in silage. The addition of XT increased the relative abundance of Clostridium and Enterobacteriaceae , but its combination with SB and BS increased the abundance of Lactiplantibacillus and inhibited the development of undesirable bacteria. Moreover, different additives changed the metabolism of carbohydrates, amino acids, energy, cofactors and vitamins of bacterial communities during ensiling. In summary, the addition of SB and SBBS was more conducive to improving the fermentation characteristics of oat, while XT, SBXT, and BSXT performed better in degrading lignocellulose in plants.

Suggested Citation

  • Yifei Huang & Siling Zhang & Maoling Hu & Shuyuan Yang & Ailing Hui & Wencheng Zhang & Zeyu Wu, 2024. "Effects of Biological Additives on the Fermentation Quality and Microbial Community of High-Moisture Oat Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2275-:d:1541649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2275/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2275/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2275-:d:1541649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.