IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i9p1802-d1238537.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Is More Important to Host-Seeking Entomopathogenic Nematodes, Innate or Learned Preference?

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Gaffke

    (USDA-ARS, Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA)

  • Maritza Romero

    (USDA-ARS, Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA)

  • Hans Alborn

    (USDA-ARS, Center for Medical, Agricultural, and Veterinary Entomology, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA)

Abstract

Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs), small soil-dwelling non-segmented roundworms, are obligate parasites of insects and commonly used in agriculture for biological control of insect pests. For successful reproduction, EPNs must identify, move towards, and successfully infect a suitable insect host in a chemically complex soil environment. EPNs can have innate host insect preferences and can be attracted to semiochemicals associated with that host. They can also develop strong learned preferences for chemical signals associated with the presence of a host, such as herbivory-induced volatiles. We hypothesized that simultaneous manipulation of innate and learned preferences could result in increased biological control services of EPNs in agriculture. Separate cohorts of the EPN Steinernema diaprepesi were raised on two insect hosts, Galleria mellonella and Tenebrio molitor , for multiple generations until the nematodes in a dual-choice olfactometer exhibited preference for the host they were reared on. Subsequently, the two strains of nematodes were imprinted on three plant-produced terpenoids of agricultural significance: pregeijerene, β-caryophyllene, and α-pinene. After exposure to one of the plant compounds, the behavior of the EPNs was assayed in an olfactometer where the two host insects were presented with and without the plant compounds. We found that plant volatile exposure increased the infection rate of the nematodes, and some host–compound combinations proved to be attractive, but other combinations appeared to become repellent. These results indicate that learned preference is neither subordinate nor superior to innate preference, and that infection efficiency can vary with compound exposure and insect host.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Gaffke & Maritza Romero & Hans Alborn, 2023. "What Is More Important to Host-Seeking Entomopathogenic Nematodes, Innate or Learned Preference?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-9, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1802-:d:1238537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/9/1802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sergio Rasmann & Tobias G. Köllner & Jörg Degenhardt & Ivan Hiltpold & Stefan Toepfer & Ulrich Kuhlmann & Jonathan Gershenzon & Ted C. J. Turlings, 2005. "Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7034), pages 732-737, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasileios Kotsinis & Alexandros Dritsoulas & Dionysios Ntinokas & Ioannis O. Giannakou, 2023. "Nematicidal Effects of Four Terpenes Differ among Entomopathogenic Nematode Species," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Anamarija Jagodič & Stanislav Trdan & Žiga Laznik, 2019. "Entomopathogenic nematodes: can we use the current knowledge on belowground multitrophic interactions in future plant protection programmes? - Review," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(4), pages 243-254.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:9:p:1802-:d:1238537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.