IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i8p1612-d1217565.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Canopy Architecture of Five Olive Cultivars in a High-Density Planting System in Sicily

Author

Listed:
  • Enrico Maria Lodolini

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, 00134 Rome, Italy)

  • Alberto de Iudicibus

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, 00134 Rome, Italy)

  • Pompea Gabriella Lucchese

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, 00134 Rome, Italy)

  • Giuseppina Las Casas

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, 95024 Acireale, Italy)

  • Biagio Torrisi

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, 95024 Acireale, Italy)

  • Elisabetta Nicolosi

    (Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy)

  • Alessio Giuffrida

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, 95024 Acireale, Italy)

  • Filippo Ferlito

    (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics, Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, 95024 Acireale, Italy)

Abstract

In a young super-high-density (SHD) olive orchard located in Aidone (EN), in the Sicily Region, Italy, the architectural features of five olive cultivars were studied, specifically Arbequina, Arbosana, Oliana ® , Giulia ® , and FS-17 ® . Surveys were conducted in November 2019 considering biometric measurements for the whole tree, the canopy, and the primary and secondary branches. The “total branching frequency”, the “sectorial branching frequency”, the “total branching efficiency”, the “sectorial branching efficiency”, and the “total relative vigour” indexes were also calculated from the previous measurements. In addition, olive yield recorded for the years 2020, 2021, and 2022 (respectively, the third, fourth, and fifth years from planting) are shown in order to provide a more exhaustive description of the features of the cultivars. Giulia ® and Oliana ® resulted in being more similar to Arbequina and Arbosana, presenting a compact shape of the canopy and high and regular ramification of primary and secondary branches. FS-17 ® showed a higher expansion in canopy volume and higher vigour than the other cultivars, features that suggest it can be more susceptible to damage during mechanical harvest. Regarding the elaborated indexes, “total branching frequency” resulted in being not statistically different among the cultivars. “Sectorial branching frequency” resulted in being higher in the middle sector of the trunk height (51–100 cm) for all the tested cultivars. This study supplies helpful information about the different canopy and branch architectural characteristics of the five studied olive cultivars with respect to their suitability to high-density plantations.

Suggested Citation

  • Enrico Maria Lodolini & Alberto de Iudicibus & Pompea Gabriella Lucchese & Giuseppina Las Casas & Biagio Torrisi & Elisabetta Nicolosi & Alessio Giuffrida & Filippo Ferlito, 2023. "Comparison of Canopy Architecture of Five Olive Cultivars in a High-Density Planting System in Sicily," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1612-:d:1217565
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1612/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1612/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1612-:d:1217565. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.