IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i6p1134-d1157889.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Growth, Physiology, and Productivity of Bouteloua gracilis and Cenchrus ciliaris Using Moisture Retainers under Different Planting Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Gerardo Yáñez-Chávez

    (Regional Universitary Unit on Arid Lands, Chapingo Autonomous University, Bermejillo 35230, Mexico)

  • Aurelio Pedroza-Sandoval

    (Regional Universitary Unit on Arid Lands, Chapingo Autonomous University, Bermejillo 35230, Mexico)

  • Ignacio Sánchez-Cohen

    (National Institute of Agricultural and Livestock Forestry Research, National Center for Disciplinary Research in Water Soil Plant Atmosphere Relations, Gómez Palacio 35079, Mexico)

  • Miguel Agustin Velásquez-Valle

    (National Institute of Agricultural and Livestock Forestry Research, Northeast Regional Research Center, Saltillo Experimental Station, Saltillo 25315, Mexico)

  • Ricardo Trejo-Calzada

    (Regional Universitary Unit on Arid Lands, Chapingo Autonomous University, Bermejillo 35230, Mexico)

Abstract

The extensive raising of livestock on grasslands is a relevant economic activity in northern Mexico. These are regions of high climatic uncertainty and have extreme weather events, which requires the exploration of technological innovation to mitigate the negative impacts on these agroecosystems. The aim of this study was to evaluate two grass species using two planting methods and two types of soil moisture retainers and to determine their response based on growth and some physiological and productive attributes. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) was used in a split–split plot arrangement with six replications. The main plots were planted with two grass species: Bouteloua gracilis and Cenchrus ciliaris ; the subplots were differentiated by two grass planting methods: seeding and seedling transplanting; the sub-subplots were differentiated by the soil moisture retainers used: (1) application on the soil of 10 t ha −1 of corn harvest residue (CHR) as organic cover on the soil surface, (2) application of hydrogel at 20 kg ha −1 mixed in the soil rhizosphere because it must be in contact with the root and soil due to its chemical composition, and (3) control, no application of any type of input. The seedling transplant method with the application of CHR significantly increased ( p < 0.05) the plant survival percentage, on average by 31.5% in both grasses, in relation to the direct method seeding and the control. C. ciliaris showed a higher photosynthetic rate and, therefore, higher forage productivity than B. gracilis . The hydrogel only showed a moisture retention effect in the soil during the first 20 days after the transplant or sowing of the grass seed; after this period, there was no longer any effect as a water retainer in the soil. The soil cover with CHR was confirmed as a good moisture retainer with greater productivity of rangeland forage in degraded soils in arid areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Gerardo Yáñez-Chávez & Aurelio Pedroza-Sandoval & Ignacio Sánchez-Cohen & Miguel Agustin Velásquez-Valle & Ricardo Trejo-Calzada, 2023. "Growth, Physiology, and Productivity of Bouteloua gracilis and Cenchrus ciliaris Using Moisture Retainers under Different Planting Methods," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:6:p:1134-:d:1157889
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/6/1134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/6/1134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:6:p:1134-:d:1157889. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.