IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i5p1079-d1150337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selection of New Sugarcane Genotypes for Sandy Soils in Florida with Enhanced Sucrose Content

Author

Listed:
  • Orlando Coto Arbelo

    (USDA-ARS Sugarcane Field Station, Canal Point, FL 33438, USA)

  • Aliya Momotaz

    (USDA-ARS Sugarcane Field Station, Canal Point, FL 33438, USA)

  • Hardev S. Sandhu

    (Everglades Research and Education Center, University of Florida, Belle Glade, FL 33430, USA)

  • Sushma Sood

    (USDA-ARS Sugarcane Field Station, Canal Point, FL 33438, USA)

  • Wayne Davidson

    (Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., Clewiston, FL 33440, USA)

  • Miguel Baltazar

    (Florida Sugar Cane League, Inc., Clewiston, FL 33440, USA)

  • Duli Zhao

    (USDA-ARS Sugarcane Field Station, Canal Point, FL 33438, USA)

Abstract

The selection of sugarcane genotypes with high sucrose content and good ratooning ability (RA) is an important objective of the Canal Point breeding program to improve the current profitability levels of the Florida sugarcane industry. In this study, thirteen test sugarcane genotypes and three checks were evaluated in three sand locations, Pahokee Produce Inc. (PP), Townsite farm (TS), and Lykes Brothers Inc. (PF), during three crop cycles (plant cane, first ratoon, and second ratoon). Multi-environment best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs) were highly significant for commercially recoverable sucrose (CRS) and not significant for cane yield (CY) among genotypes. The ANOVA based on the RA values produced significant genotypic effects but a reduced RA diversity among the genotypes. The simultaneous selection for BLUP_CRS, BLUP_CY yield, and RA identified CP 14-4165 and CP 13-2340 as the most outstanding genotypes. The BLUP_GGE biplots method showed that the PP location was the most discriminative for BLUP_CY, whereas the TS was the ideal location. For BLUP_CRS, the three locations had similar abilities to discriminate genotypes and were positively and strongly correlated. The which-won-where graph indicated that CP 13-2340 showed the highest BLUP_CRS levels in TS and PP locations, while CP 14-4165 and CP 14-4588 were the top genotypes in the PF location. The results suggest that selecting genotypes with high CRS values is possible without compromising the genotype discrimination for CY. CP 14-4165 and CP 13-2340 are resistant to most diseases and genetically diverse.

Suggested Citation

  • Orlando Coto Arbelo & Aliya Momotaz & Hardev S. Sandhu & Sushma Sood & Wayne Davidson & Miguel Baltazar & Duli Zhao, 2023. "Selection of New Sugarcane Genotypes for Sandy Soils in Florida with Enhanced Sucrose Content," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1079-:d:1150337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/5/1079/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/5/1079/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yong Zhao & Jiayong Liu & Hairong Huang & Fenggang Zan & Peifang Zhao & Jun Zhao & Jun Deng & Caiwen Wu, 2022. "Genetic Improvement of Sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) Contributed to High Sucrose Content in China Based on an Analysis of Newly Developed Varieties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-16, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1079-:d:1150337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.