IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i10p1902-d1249854.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Soil Microbial Community Responses to Cyanobacteria versus Traditional Organic Fertilizers

Author

Listed:
  • Antisar Afkairin

    (Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, C127 Plant Sciences Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170, USA)

  • Mary Stromberger

    (Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, C127 Plant Sciences Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170, USA
    The Ohio State University Graduate School, Columbus, OH 43210, USA)

  • Heather Storteboom

    (Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, C127 Plant Sciences Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170, USA)

  • Allison Wickham

    (Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, C127 Plant Sciences Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170, USA)

  • David G. Sterle

    (Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, C127 Plant Sciences Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170, USA
    Western Colorado Research Center, 3168 B 1/2 Rd, Grand Junction, CO 81503, USA)

  • Jessica G. Davis

    (Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, C127 Plant Sciences Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1170, USA
    Agricultural Experiment Station, Nutrien Ag Sciences Building, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-3001, USA)

Abstract

This study explores the impact of diverse organic fertilizers, including a non-traditional cyanobacteria-based alternative, on soil microbial communities in varying soil types and depths. The research aims to elucidate the effects of these fertilizers on soil microorganisms in certified organic cucumber ( Cucumis sativus ) field and peach ( Prunus persica ) orchard settings. Fertilizers were applied either on the soil surface or banded 5 cm below the soil surface, and microbial ester-linked fatty acids (EL-FAMEs) were analyzed in collected soils. Notably, cyanobacteria and Neptune hydrolyzed fish emulsion fertilizers induced significant alterations in the microbial communities of cucumber plots, enhancing microbial biomass and favoring the proliferation of Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria, and actinomycetes compared to other treatments. In the peach orchard, fertilizer choice differentially impacted microbial communities, especially in the first year and at greater soil depths. Notably, the supplementation of poultry manure with cyanobacteria fertilizer resulted in augmented microbial biomass and relative fungal and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal abundances compared to poultry manure alone. These shifts have promising implications for organic vegetable and fruit cultivation. The study further underscores the potential of cyanobacteria-based fertilizers to reduce reliance on traditional options and minimize manure application, promoting self-sufficiency and benefiting soil microorganisms, plant growth, and the ecosystem. Thus, the research emphasizes the importance of exploring and adopting cyanobacteria-based fertilizers to bolster sustainable agricultural practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Antisar Afkairin & Mary Stromberger & Heather Storteboom & Allison Wickham & David G. Sterle & Jessica G. Davis, 2023. "Soil Microbial Community Responses to Cyanobacteria versus Traditional Organic Fertilizers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:1902-:d:1249854
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/1902/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/10/1902/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:10:p:1902-:d:1249854. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.