IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1358-d904000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exogenous Fibrolytic Enzymes and Length of Storage Affect the Nutritive Value and Fermentation Profile of Maize Silage

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Salvo

    (Department of Animal Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil)

  • Viviane Gritti

    (Department of Animal Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil)

  • Érica da Silva

    (Department of Animal Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil)

  • Elisabet Nadeau

    (Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 532 23 Skara, Sweden)

  • João Daniel

    (Department of Animal Science, State University of Maringa, Maringa 87020-900, PR, Brazil)

  • Maria Spindola

    (Adisseo Brasil Nutrição Animal, Sao Paulo 05804-900, SP, Brazil)

  • Luiz Nussio

    (Department of Animal Science, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, University of Sao Paulo, Piracicaba 13418-900, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

The addition of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes (EFEs) and length of storage can affect the quality of maize silage. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the fermentative profile and the nutritive value of maize silage treated with different doses of EFEs ensiled for 30, 60, or 90 days. The study was designed as completely randomized in a split-plot arrangement of treatments, where four doses of EFEs were assigned to the main plot and three lengths of storage to the sub-plot, with four replicates per treatment. Treatments were: Control, E100 (EFEs at 100 g/ton dry matter (DM)), E150 (EFEs at 150 g/ton DM) and E200 (EFEs at 200 g/ton DM). The EFE treatment did not increase the digestibility of nutrients but increased the acetic acid concentration (1.87 vs. 1.18% DM), while decreasing the content of ethanol (0.02 vs. 0.08% DM), ethyl lactate (7.50 vs. 15.9 mg/DM) and ethyl acetate (5.58 vs. 10.6 mg/DM). Prolonged storage increased DM losses (7.05 vs. 2.32%) and acetic acid content (2.19 vs. 1.03% DM), but decreased ethanol concentration (0.02 vs. 0.09% DM). In conclusion, the addition of EFEs in maize silages did not affect nutrient digestibility and DM losses during fermentation, but it slightly decreased the concentrations of ethanol and esters and increased the acetic acid content. Although statistically significant, such differences may not be relevant biologically, due to the relatively low concentrations of ethanol and esters in all treatments.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Salvo & Viviane Gritti & Érica da Silva & Elisabet Nadeau & João Daniel & Maria Spindola & Luiz Nussio, 2022. "Exogenous Fibrolytic Enzymes and Length of Storage Affect the Nutritive Value and Fermentation Profile of Maize Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1358-:d:904000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1358/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1358/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1358-:d:904000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.