IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i5p699-d816416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compost and Biostimulants versus Mineral Nitrogen on Productivity and Grain Quality of Two Wheat Cultivars

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Abbas

    (Natural Resources Department, Faculty of African Postgraduate Studies, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)

  • Hashim Abdel-Lattif

    (Agronomy Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)

  • Ramadan Badawy

    (Agronomy Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)

  • Mustafa Abd El-Wahab

    (Agronomy Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)

  • Mohamed Shahba

    (Natural Resources Department, Faculty of African Postgraduate Studies, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)

Abstract

To reduce the environmental pollution, this study was designed to test the effect of using compost and biostimulants as total or partial replacement for mineral nitrogen on productivity and grain quality of two wheat cultivars. Two field experiments were conducted in the Desert Experimental Station, Cairo University located at Wadi El-Natroon, Egypt during two successive seasons (2016/2017 and 2017/2018). A split-split-plot design in a randomized complete block arrangement was used. Four fertilizer treatments (100% mineral nitrogen as control, 100% compost, 75% compost + 25% mineral nitrogen and 50% compost + 50% mineral nitrogen). Four levels of biostimulants foliar applications (control, 0.75 L ha −1 , 1.13 L ha −1 and 1.5 L ha −1 ). Treatments were tested on two wheat cultivars (Egyptian cultivar, Gemmiza-10 and Nigerian cultivar, LacriWhit-4). Results indicated that, the treatment of 50% compost + 50% mineral nitrogen fertilizer along with 1.5 L ha −1 of biostimulants (VIUSID ® agro) significantly increased the grain yield of both wheat cultivars, LacriWhit-4 and Gemmiza-10 (4.44- and 4.53-ton ha −1 , respectively). The increase of grain yield was 0.9- and 1.36-ton ha −1 , respectively. The treatment of 100% compost significantly increased protein, crude fiber, total sugars, Mg and Mn contents in grain while the treatment of 100% mineral nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased ash, total phenols, P and Ca contents in grain. Replacing nitrogen fertilization with compost significantly increased ether extract and carbohydrates content of the Nigerian cultivar grains while N, K and Fe contents were increased in the grains of both tested cultivars. The foliar application of biostimulants (VIUSID ® agro) at different levels significantly increased protein, carbohydrates, total sugars, P, K, Ca, Cu and Zn contents. It can be concluded that replacing mineral nitrogen fertilizer with a combination of compost and mineral nitrogen (50% compost + 50% mineral nitrogen) along with 1.5 L ha −1 of biostimulants (VIUSID ® agro) is recommended for the enhancement of productivity and grain quality of wheat while reducing environmental pollution.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Abbas & Hashim Abdel-Lattif & Ramadan Badawy & Mustafa Abd El-Wahab & Mohamed Shahba, 2022. "Compost and Biostimulants versus Mineral Nitrogen on Productivity and Grain Quality of Two Wheat Cultivars," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:699-:d:816416
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/5/699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/5/699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:5:p:699-:d:816416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.