IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i3p427-d774318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimizing the In-Vessel Composting Process of Sugarbeet Dry-Cleaning Residue

Author

Listed:
  • Said Elshahat Abdallah

    (Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt)

  • Yasser S. A. Mazrou

    (Community College at Muhyle, King Khalid University, Abha 62587, Saudi Arabia
    Agriculture Economic Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt)

  • Tamer Elsakhawy

    (Microbiological Research Department, Solis, Water & Environment Research Institute (SWERI), Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Giza 12112, Egypt)

  • Reda Elgarhy

    (Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt)

  • Adel H. Elmetwalli

    (Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt)

  • Salah Elsayed

    (Agricultural Engineering, Evaluation of Natural Resources Department, Environmental Studies and Research Institute, University of Sadat City, Minufiya 32897, Egypt)

  • Wael M. Elmessery

    (Agricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh 33516, Egypt)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization and industrialization around the world have created massive amounts of organic residues, which have been prioritized for conversion into valuable resources through the composting process to keep their harmful effect at a minimum. This research aimed to assess the influence of active and passive aeration on composting mass of sugar beet residues in the case of using additives (e.g., charcoal only or manure only or combination). Some physicochemical properties of composting mass were analyzed on certain days of composting. Some parameters including temperature–time profile, carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N ratio), moisture content, electrical conductivity, pH, germination and microbial population enumeration of compost were measured. Cress germination test was conducted for each medium of germination which contains a mixture of soil and compost (at a ratio of 3:1) taken from each treatment. The results showed that temperature–time profile data of composting mass showed an irregularity. Forcedly aerated composting mass did not demonstrate a thermophilic phase while passively aerated ones did not show a mesophilic phase. Carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio reduction was greater in most forcedly aerated composting mass than passively aerated on days from 1 to 33 of composting period. The results further showed that electrical conductivity decreased at the end of the composting period where it ranged from 2.55 to 3.1 dS/m. Germination medium containing forcedly aerated compost treated with a combination of charcoal and manure achieved the highest germination index which was higher than the control sample by 58.63% followed by forcedly aerated composting mass treated by charcoal only which exceeded the control sample by 5.35%. Strong correlation coefficient (r > 0.80) for the relationship between germination index and number of bacteria was obtained on day 17th of composting period.

Suggested Citation

  • Said Elshahat Abdallah & Yasser S. A. Mazrou & Tamer Elsakhawy & Reda Elgarhy & Adel H. Elmetwalli & Salah Elsayed & Wael M. Elmessery, 2022. "Optimizing the In-Vessel Composting Process of Sugarbeet Dry-Cleaning Residue," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-23, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:427-:d:774318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/3/427/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/3/427/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:427-:d:774318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.