IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i3p335-d759299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transpiration Responses of Herbicide-Resistant and -Susceptible Palmer Amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri (S.) Wats.) to Progressively Drying Soil

Author

Listed:
  • Koffi Badou-Jeremie Kouame

    (Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA)

  • Mary C. Savin

    (Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA)

  • Gulab Rangani

    (Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA)

  • Thomas R. Butts

    (Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA)

  • Matthew B. Bertucci

    (Department of Horticulture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA)

  • Nilda Roma-Burgos

    (Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, USA)

Abstract

Drought events are predicted to increase in the future. Evaluating the response of herbicide-resistant and -susceptible weed ecotypes to progressive drought can provide insights into whether resistance traits affect the fitness of resistant weed populations. Two experiments were conducted in the greenhouse between January and May 2021 to evaluate drought tolerance differences between Palmer amaranth accessions resistant to S -metolachlor or glyphosate and their susceptible counterparts. The accessions used were S -metolachlor-resistant (17TUN-A), a susceptible standard (09CRW-A), and glyphosate-resistant (22–165 EPSPS copies) and glyphosate-susceptible (3–10 EPSPS copies) plants from accession 16CRW-D. Daily transpiration of each plant was measured. The daily transpiration rate was converted to normalized transpiration ratio (NTR) using a double-normalization procedure. The daily soil water content was expressed as a fraction of transpirable soil water (FTSW). The threshold FTSW (FTSWcr), after which NTR decreases linearly, was estimated using a two-segment linear regression analysis. The data showed differences between S -metolachlor-resistant and -susceptible accessions ( p ≤ 0.05). The FTSW remaining in the soil at the breakpoint for the S -metolachlor-susceptible accession (09CRW-A) was 0.17 ± 0.007. The FTSW remaining in the soil at the breakpoint for the S -metolachlor-resistant accession (17TUN-A) was 0.23 ± 0.004. The FTSW remaining in the soil at the breakpoint for the glyphosate-resistant and glyphosate-susceptible plants (16CRW-D) was 0.25 ± 0.007 and 0.25 ± 0.008, respectively. Although the mechanism endowing resistance to S -metolachlor might have contributed to increased drought tolerance, follow-up experiments are needed in order to verify this finding. Increased EPSPS copy numbers did not improve the drought tolerance of Palmer amaranth. As droughts are predicted to increase in frequency and severity, these results suggest that S -metolachlor-resistant and glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth populations will not be at a competitive disadvantage compared to susceptible genotypes. Alternative and diverse management strategies will be required for effective Palmer amaranth control, regardless of herbicide resistance status.

Suggested Citation

  • Koffi Badou-Jeremie Kouame & Mary C. Savin & Gulab Rangani & Thomas R. Butts & Matthew B. Bertucci & Nilda Roma-Burgos, 2022. "Transpiration Responses of Herbicide-Resistant and -Susceptible Palmer Amaranth ( Amaranthus palmeri (S.) Wats.) to Progressively Drying Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-11, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:335-:d:759299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/3/335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/3/335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura C. Bowling & Keith A. Cherkauer & Charlotte I. Lee & Janna L. Beckerman & Sylvie Brouder & Jonathan R. Buzan & Otto C. Doering & Jeffrey S. Dukes & Paul D. Ebner & Jane R. Frankenberger & Benjam, 2020. "Agricultural impacts of climate change in Indiana and potential adaptations," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 163(4), pages 2005-2027, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Avila & Nilda Roma-Burgos, 2023. "Herbicide Physiology and Environmental Fate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-2, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keith A. Cherkauer & Laura C. Bowling & Kyuhyun Byun & Indrajeet Chaubey & Natalie Chin & Darren L. Ficklin & Alan F. Hamlet & Stephen J. Kines & Charlotte I. Lee & Ram Neupane & Garett W. Pignotti & , 2021. "Climate change impacts and strategies for adaptation for water resource management in Indiana," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Huong Nguyen & Marcus Randall & Andrew Lewis, 2024. "Factors Affecting Crop Prices in the Context of Climate Change—A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Jonathon Day & Natalie Chin & Sandra Sydnor & Melissa Widhalm & Kalim U. Shah & Leslie Dorworth, 2021. "Implications of climate change for tourism and outdoor recreation: an Indiana, USA, case study," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:335-:d:759299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.