IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i12p2044-d987605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Analysis on the Temperature Prediction Model for Bailing Mushroom in Jizhou, Tianjin

Author

Listed:
  • Ruolan Liu

    (School of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China)

  • Shujie Yuan

    (School of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China)

  • Lin Han

    (School of Atmospheric Sciences, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu 610225, China)

Abstract

Based on the air temperature, wind speed, humidity, air pressure, etc., of the regional automatic weather station in Chutouling Town, Jizhou from April 2019 to November 2020, and the air temperature of the microclimate observation station receiving data every 10 min in a bailing mushroom greenhouse, this paper analyzed and evaluated a BP (back propagation) neural network and stepwise regression method to establish a prediction model for the temperature in the Bailing mushroom greenhouse for different seasons. The results showed that: (1) The air temperature, wind speed, humidity and air pressure outside the shed were the main factors for building the temperature prediction model for the inside temperature, and the air temperature was the most important factor affecting the temperature inside the shed. After introducing humidity, wind speed and air pressure, the accuracy of the model was significantly improved. (2) The temperature prediction model based on the BP neural network method, for every 10 min interval in the greenhouse, for the Bailing mushroom in different seasons, was more accurate than the stepwise regression model. The simulation results of the two models had the highest accuracy in summer, followed by autumn. (3) The root means square error of the BP neural network and stepwise regression model for inside the greenhouse, simulating the daily temperature variations for different seasons, was 1.25, 1.10, 1.08, 1.31 °C and 1.29, 1.19, 1.11, 1.37 °C, respectively. The BP neural network method performed better for predicting the daily temperature variations in seasons. (4) The specifying data of high temperature (24 July 2020) and strong cold wave (31 December 2019) were selected to test the two model methods; the results showed that the simulation of the BP neural network model was better than the stepwise regression model.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruolan Liu & Shujie Yuan & Lin Han, 2022. "Evaluation and Analysis on the Temperature Prediction Model for Bailing Mushroom in Jizhou, Tianjin," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2044-:d:987605
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2044/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/12/2044/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:12:p:2044-:d:987605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.